De la bibliometría al emprendimiento: un estudio de estudios
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2020.3.1702Palabras clave:
Emprendimiento, bibliometría, revisión sistemática, campo de investigaciónResumen
Los estudios bibliométricos sobre emprendimiento como disciplina académica han contribuido fundamentalmente a crear orden en una literatura aparentemente caótica y contradictoria, examinan su desarrollo y dan una visión integral de la estructura del campo, observan sus redes sociales, detectan tendencias, descubren brechas de conocimiento y ayudan a planificar futuras líneas de investigación. El objetivo de este artículo es explorar este tipo especial de investigación. Desde el punto de vista metodológico se utiliza una adaptación del proceso de revisión sistemática de la literatura y un análisis de contenido a través de software de minería de textos para profundizar en objetivos, conclusiones y limitaciones de este tipo de análisis. Entre los principales hallazgos encontramos evidencias que indican que la imagen ofrecida hasta la fecha sobre el emprendimiento no ha considerado la naturaleza multidisciplinaria del campo y, por tanto, podría estar distorsionada. A su vez, se detectan una serie de problemas inherentes a su desarrollo, se hace evidente la necesidad de incorporar los últimos avances en bibliometría, mejorando la colaboración entre expertos de ambos campos para resolverlos y avanzar hacia el progreso futuro.
Descargas
Citas
Acs, Z. J.; Braunerhjelm, P.; Audretsch, D. B.; Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3
Audretsch D.B.; Keilbach, M. C.; Lehmann, E. E. (2006). Entrepreneurship and economic growth: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183511.001.0001
Audretsch D.B.; Kuratko, D. F.; Link, A. N. (2015). Making sense of the elusive paradigm of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 45(4), 703-712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9663-z
Audretsch, D. B; Thurik, R. (2001). Linking Entrepreneurship to Growth. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers.
Bhupatiraju, S.; Nomaler, O.; Triulzi, G.; Verspagen, B. (2012). Knowledge flows - Analyzing the core literature of innovation, entrepreneurship and science and technology studies. Research Policy, 41(7), 1205- 1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.011
Bornmann, L.; Wohlrabe, K. (2017). Normalisation of citation impact in economics. Scientometrics, 1-44.
Bornmann, L.; Marx, W. (2018). Critical rationalism and the search for standard (field-normalized) indicators in bibliometrics. Journal of Informetrics, 12(3), 598-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.05.002
Busenitz, L. W.; Plummer, L. A.; Klotz, A. C., Shahzad, A.; Rhoads, K. (2014). Entrepreneurship Research (1985-2009) and the Emergence of Opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(5), 981- 1000. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12120
Busenitz, L. W.; West, G. P.; Shepherd, D.; Nelson, T.; Chandler, G. N.; Zacharakis, A. (2003). Entrepreneurship research in emergence: Past trends and future directions. Journal of Management, 29(3), 285-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00013-8
Cabeza-Ramirez, L. J.; Canizares, S. M. S.; Fuentes- Garcia, F. J. (2018). Characterisation of the classics of entrepreneurship (1968-2016). An analysis based on Web of Science. Revista Española De Documentacion Cientifica, 41(2), e202. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2018.2.1488
Cabeza-Ramírez, L. J.; Sánchez-Cañizares, S. M.; Fuentes- García, F. J. (2017). Entrepreneurship as a dynamic field of study: a bibliometric analysis of research output. Tourism & Management Studies, 13(3), 59-71. https://doi.org/10.18089/tms.2017.13307
Campos, H. M.; Parellada, F. S.; Palma, Y. (2012). Mapping the Intellectual Structure of Entrepreneurship Research: revisiting the invisible college. Rbgn-Revista Brasileira De Gestao De Negocios, 14(42), 41-58. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v14i42.958
Caputo, A.; Marzi, G.; Pellegrini, M. M.; Rialti, R. (2018). Conflict management in family businesses: A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. International Journal of Conflict Management, 29(4), 519-542. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-02-2018-0027
Carlsson, B.; Braunerhjelm, P.; McKelvey, M.; Olofsson, C.; Persson, L.; Ylinenpaa, H. (2013). The evolving domain of entrepreneurship research. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 913-930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9503-y
Chandra, Y. (2018). Mapping the evolution of entrepreneurship as a field of research (1990-2013): A scientometric analysis. Plos One, 13(1), e0190228. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190228 PMid:29300735 PMCid:PMC5754054
Chang, Y. W.; Huang, M. H.; Lin, C. W. (2015). Evolution of research subjects in library and information science based on keyword, bibliographical coupling, and co-citation analyses. Scientometrics, 105(3), 2071-2087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1762-8
Chen, J. K. C. (2015). Entrepreneurship Research Dynamics (1992-2013): Aim at Entrepreneurial, Innovative Firms and Business Operations. In: Kocaoglu, D. F.; Anderson, T. R.; Daim, T. U.; Kozanoglu, D. C.; Niwa, K.; Perman, G. (eds.), 2015 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), pp. 953-960. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2015.7273054
Chen, J. K. C.; Ho, Y.-S.; Wang, M.-H.; Wu, Y.-R. (2011). Perspective research entrepreneurship output performance in 1992-2009. 2011 Proceedings of PICMET'11: Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET), pp. 1-10. IEEE.
Cobo, M. J.; Lopez-Herrera, A. G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F. (2011). Science Mapping Software Tools: Review, Analysis, and Cooperative Study Among Tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382-1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
Cornelius, B.; Landstrom, H.; Persson, O. (2006). Entrepreneurial studies: The dynamic research front of a developing social science. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 375-398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00125.x
da Costa Ferreira, E. M. (2009). Searching for "invisible colleges" in the Entrepreneurship literature. https:// sigarra.up.pt/fcup/pt/pub_geral.pub_view?pi_pub_ base_id=25512
Dan, M. C.; Goia, S. I. (2018). Entrepreneurship and regional development. A bibliometric analysis. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 12(1), 276-287. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2018-0025
Dean, M. A.; Shook, C. L.; Payne, G. T. (2007). The past, present, and future of entrepreneurship research: Data analytic trends and training. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(4), 601-618. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00190.x
Dery, R.; Toulouse, J. M. (1996). Social structuration of the field of entrepreneurship: A case study. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration, 13(4), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.1996.tb00739.x
Ferreira, J. J. M.; Fernandes, C. I.; Kraus, S. (2019). Entrepreneurship research: mapping intellectual structures and research trends. Review of Managerial Science, 13(1), 181-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0242-3
Galvao, A.; Ferreira, J. J.; Marques, C. (2018). Entrepreneurship education and training as facilitators of regional development A systematic literature review. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 25(1), 17-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-05-2017-0178
Gartner, W. B.; Davidsson, P.; Zahra, S. A. (2006). Are you talking to me? The nature of community in entrepreneurship scholarship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 321-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00123.x
Gregoire, D. A.; Noel, M. X.; Dery, R.; Bechard, J. P. (2006). Is there conceptual convergence in entrepreneurship research? A co-citation analysis of Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1981-2004. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 333-373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00124.x
Gutierrez-Salcedo, M.; Martinez, M. A.; Moral-Munoz, J. A.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Cobo, M. J. (2018). Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields. Applied Intelligence, 48(5), 1275- 1287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1105-y
Hicks, D.; Wouters, P.; Waltman, L.; de Rijcke, S.; Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429-431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a PMid:25903611
Jing, S.; Qinghua, Z.; Landström, H. (2015a). Entrepreneurship across Regions: Internationalization and/or Contextualization? In: Handbook of Research on Global Competitive Advantage through Innovation and Entrepreneurship, pp. 372-392. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8348-8.ch022
Jing, S.; Qinghua, Z.; Landstrom, H. (2015b). Entrepreneurship research in three regions-the USA, Europe and China. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 861-890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0315-6
Kuhn, K. D. (2018). Using structural topic modeling to identify latent topics and trends in aviation incident reports. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 87, 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.12.018
Kushkowski, J. D. (2012). Charting the Growth of Entrepreneurship: A Citation Analysis of FER Content, 1981-2008. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 17(3), 201-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/08963568.2012.685035
Landstrom, H.; Harirchi, G. (2018). The social structure of entrepreneurship as a scientific field. Research Policy, 47(3), 650-662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.013
Landstrom, H.; Harirchi, G.; Astrom, F. (2012). Entrepreneurship: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41(7), 1154-1181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.009
Landstrom, H.; Persson, O. (2010). Entrepreneurship research: research communities and knowledge platforms. In: Historical Foundations of Entrepreneurship Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Liñan, F.; Fayolle, A. (2015). A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions: citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 907-933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-015-0356-5
Lopez-Fernandez, M. C.; Serrano-Bedia, A. M.; Perez- Perez, M. (2016). Entrepreneurship and Family Firm Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of An Emerging Field. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(2), 622-639. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12161
Low, M. B.; Macmillan, I. C. (1988). Entrepreneurship-past research and future challenges. Journal of Management, 14(2), 139-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638801400202
Martinez, M. A.; Herrera, M.; Lopez-Gijon, J.; Herrera- Viedma, E. (2014). H-Classics: characterizing the concept of citation classics through H-index. Scientometrics, 98(3), 1971-1983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1155-9
Meyer, M.; Libaers, D.; Thijs, B.; Grant, K.; Glanzel, W.; Debackere, K. (2014). Origin and emergence of entrepreneurship as a research field. Scientometrics, 98(1), 473-485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1021-9
Mimno, D., Wallach, H. M., Talley, E., Leenders, M., & McCallum, A. (2011). Optimizing semantic coherence in topic models. Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, pp. 262-272. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Pan, X. L.; Yan, E. J.; Cui, M.; Hua, W. N. (2018). Examining the usage, citation, and diffusion patterns of bibliometric mapping software: A comparative study of three tools. Journal of Informetrics, 12(2), 481-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.03.005
Persson, O.; Danell, R.; Schneider, J. W. (2009). How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. In: Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th Birthday, vol. 5, pp. 9-24.
Pittaway, L.; Cope, J. (2007). Entrepreneurship education - A systematic review of the evidence. International Small Business Journal, 25(5), 479-510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242607080656
Pittaway, L.; Robertson, M.; Munir, K.; Denyer, D.; Neely, A. (2004). Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5-6(3-4), 137-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00101.x
Qian, G. (2014). Computational and visual analysis of the development stage of theories in the social sciences: a case in the entrepreneurship field. Current Science, 107(11), 1795-1799. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24107823?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Ramos, A. R. (2004). Intellectual structure of entrepreneurship research: A bibliometric study, 1956-2003 (Spanish text). https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9338419
Ratnatunga, J.; Romano, C. (1997). A ''citation classics'' analysis of articles in contemporary small enterprise research. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(3), 197- 212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(96)00062-6
Reader, D.; Watkins, D. (2006). The social and collaborative nature of entrepreneurship scholarship: A co-citation and perceptual analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 417-441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00127.x
Romano, C.; Ratnatunga, J. (1996). A citation analysis of the impact of journals on contemporary small enterprise research. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice, 20(3), 7-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879602000301
Sassmannshausen, S. P.; Volkmann, C. (2018). The Scientometrics of Social Entrepreneurship and Its Establishment as an Academic Field. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(2), 251-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12254
Schildt, H. A. (2002). Sitkis: software for bibliometric data management and analysis. Helsinki Institute of Strategy International Business, 6, 1.
Schildt, H. A.; Zahra, S. A.; Sillanpaa, A. (2006). Scholarly communities in entrepreneurship research: A co-citation analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 399-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00126.x
Schmitz, A.; Urbano, D.; Dandolini, G. A.; de Souza, J. A., & Guerrero, M. (2017). Innovation and entrepreneurship in the academic setting: a systematic literature review. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(2), 369-395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0401-z
Shane (1997). Who is publishing the entrepreneurship research? Journal of Management, 23(1), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300105
Shane, S.; Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611
Sorenson, O.; Stuart, T. E. (2008). Entrepreneurship: A Field of Dreams? Academy of Management Annals, 2, 517- 543. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211669
Teixeira, A. C. (2011). Mapping the (in)visible college(s) in the field of entrepreneurship. Scientometrics, 89(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0445-3
Teixeira, A. C.; Ferreira, E. (2013). Intellectual structure of the entrepreneurship field: a tale based on three core journals. Journal of Innovation Management, 1(2), 21-66. https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_001.002_0005
Thorpe, R.; Holt, R., Macpherson, A.; Pittaway, L. (2006). Using knowledge within small and medium-sized firms: A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(4), 257-281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00116.x
Tranfield, D.; Denyer, D.; Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207- 222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
van Praag, C. M.; Versloot, P. H. (2007). What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research. Small Business Economics, 29(4), 351-382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9074-x
Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence growth, 3(1), 119- 138.
Waltman, L.; van Eck, N. J. (2013). A systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 833-849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.08.002
Xu, N. H.; Chen, Y. N.; Fung, A. N.; Chan, K. C. (2018). Contributing Forces in Entrepreneurship Research: A Global Citation Analysis. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(1), 179-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12367
Yu, L.-C.; Tang, T.-I. (2014). A visual analytic study of articles in entrepreneurship research. The Fourteenth International Conference on Electronic Business & The First Global Conference on Internet and Information Systems, Taiwan.
Zupic, I.; Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
© CSIC. Los originales publicados en las ediciones impresa y electrónica de esta Revista son propiedad del Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, siendo necesario citar la procedencia en cualquier reproducción parcial o total.Salvo indicación contraria, todos los contenidos de la edición electrónica se distribuyen bajo una licencia de uso y distribución “Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional ” (CC BY 4.0). Puede consultar desde aquí la versión informativa y el texto legal de la licencia. Esta circunstancia ha de hacerse constar expresamente de esta forma cuando sea necesario.
No se autoriza el depósito en repositorios, páginas web personales o similares de cualquier otra versión distinta a la publicada por el editor.
