Scientific collaboration: main research lines and future challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2014.4.1186Keywords:
Scientific collaboration, collaborative work, Science and Technology, researchers, collaborative researchAbstract
The construction of knowledge is a collaborative process that has seen a dramatic growth over recent decades, since almost all research activities now involve increasing numbers of researchers, institutions, disciplines and countries. The present study provides a bibliographic review of the literature on research collaboration and identifies pioneering work on the topic, the types of studies undertaken and the variables analyzed. Several approaches are discussed: the “classical” approach, based on bibliometric indicators, which has taken on a new dimension with Social Network Analysis; and quantitative and qualitative approaches, which attempt to investigate the motivations and dynamics of collaborative work. The study of scientific collaboration has been undertaken using a variety of methodologies from different disciplinary perspectives. This was made evident at the Congress “Scientific collaboration: a multidisciplinary approach” held at University of Valencia in November 2013, which brought together leading experts on the subject from around Spain. This special issue of Revista Española de Documentación Científica contains ten selected papers presented at that event. We conclude this introductory paper by examining the main challenges that research into scientific collaboration should explore.
Downloads
References
Abadal, E.; Ollé Castellà, C.; Abad-García, F.; Melero, R. (2013). Políticas de acceso abierto a la ciencia en las universidades españolas. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, vol. 36(2), e007. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2013.2.933
Adams, J. D.; Chiang, E. P.; Starkey, K. (2001). Industry-University Cooperative Research Centers. Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 26(1-2), 73-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007836328722
Barabási, A. L.; Jeong, H.; Néda, Z.; Ravasz, E.; Schubert, A.; Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 311(3-4), 590-614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(02)00736-7
Beaver, D.; Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration. Part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, vol. 1(1), 65-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02016840
Beaver, D.; Rosen, R. (1979a). Studies in scientific collaboration. Part III. Professionalization and the natural history of modern scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, vol. 1(3), 231-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02016308
Beaver, D.; Rosen, R. (1979b). Studies in scientific collaboration. Part II. Scientific co-authorship, research productivity and visibility in the French scientific elite, 1799-1830. Scientometrics, vol. 1(2), 133-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02016966
Beaver, D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): past, present, and future. Scientometrics, vol. 52(3), 365-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1014254214337
Birnholtz, J. P. (2007). When do researchers collaborate? Toward a model of collaboration propensity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 58(14), 2226-2239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20684
Bordons, M.; Gomez, I.; Fernández, M. T.; Zulueta, M. A.; Méndez, A. (1996). Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research. Scientometrics, vol. 37(2), 279-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02093625
Borrego Huerta, A. (1999). La investigación cualitativa y sus aplicaciones en Biblioteconomía y Documentación. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, vol. 22(2): 139-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.1999.v22.i2.335
Bourdieu, P. (1990). Homo academicus. Cambridge; Polity Press.
Bozeman, B.; Corley, E. (2004). Scientists´ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, vol. 33(4), 599-616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.008
Bozeman, B.; Fay, D.; Slade, C. P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art. Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 38, 1-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9281-8
Bukvova, H. (2010). Studying research collaboration: a literature review. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, vol. 10(3).
Calvert, J.; Patel, P. (2003). University-industry research collaborations in the UK: bibliometric trends. Science and Public Policy, vol. 30(2), 85-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154303781780597
Camargo, O. (2012). La autoría inmerecida en las publicaciones. Revista Redbioética/UNESCO, vol. 1(5), 19-31.
Chompalov, I.; Genuth, J.; Shrum, W. (2002). The organization of scientific collaborations. Research Policy, vol. 31(5), 749-767. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00145-7
Crane, D. (1969). Social structure in a group of scientists: a test of the invisible college hypothesis. American Sociological Review, vol. 34(3), 335-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2092499
Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: a postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 52(7), 558-569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097
Ding, Y. (2011). Scientific collaboration and endorsement: network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks. Journal of Informetrics, vol. 5(1), 187-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.008
Finholt, T. A.; Olson, G. M. (1997). From laboratories to collaboratories: a new organizational form for scientific collaboration. Psychological Science, vol. 8(1), 28-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00540.x
Frame, J. D.; Carpenter, M. P. (1979). International research collaboration. Social Studies of Science, vol. 9(4), 481-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631277900900405
Franzoni, C.; Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, vol. 43, 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005
Freeman, L. C. (1978-79). Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Social Networks, vol. 1(3), 215-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
Funtowicz, S. O.; Ravetz, J. R. (2000). La ciencia posnormal: Ciencia con la gente. Barcelona; Icaria, p. 109.
Galison, P.; Helvy B. (eds.) (1992). Big Science: the growth of large-scale research. Stanford, California; Stanford University Press. p. 392.
Gazni, A.; Didegah, F. (2011). Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: A case study of Harvard University's publications. Scientometrics, vol. 87(2), 251-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0343-8
Geison, G. L. (1981). Scientific change, emerging specialties and research schools. History of Science, vol. 10, 20-40.
Gibbons, M.; Limoges, C.; Nowotny, H.; Schwartzman, S.; Scott, P.; Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Londres; Sage. p. 192.
Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, vol. 51(1), 69-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010512628145
Glänzel, W. (2002). Co-authorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980-1998): a bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends, vol. 50(3), 461-473.
Glänzel, W.; De Lange, C. (2002). A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, vol. 54(1), 75-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1015684505035
González Albo, B.; Moreno, L.; Morillo, F.; Bordons, M. (2012). Indicadores bibliométricos para el análisis de la actividad de una institución multidisciplinar: el CSIC. Revista española de Documentación Científica, vol. 35(1), 9-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2012.1.851
González Alcaide, G.; Valderrama Zurián, J.; Aleixandre Benavent, R. (2012). Análisis del proceso de internacionalización de la investigación española en ciencia y tecnología (1980-2007). Revista española de Documentación Científica, vol. 35(1), 94-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2012.1.847
González Alcaide, G.; Gómez Ferri, J.; Agulló Calatayud, V. (coords.) (2013). La colaboración científica: una aproximación multidisciplinar. Valencia; Nau Llibres. p. 542.
González Alcaide, G.; Calafat, A.; Becoña, E. (2014). Núcleos y ámbitos de investigación sobre adicciones en España a través del análisis de los enlaces bibliográficos en la Web of Science (2000-2013). Adicciones, vol. 26(2), 168-183.
Gordon, M. D. (1980). A critical reassessment of inferred relations between multiple authorship, scientific collaboration, the production of papers and their acceptance for publication. Scientometrics, vol. 2(3), 193-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02016697
Hara, N.; Solomon, P; Kim, S. L.; Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003). An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 54(10), 952-965. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.10291
Harsanyi, M. A. (1993). Multiple authors, multiple problems-bibliometrics and the study of scholarly collaboration: a literature review. Library and Information Science Research, vol. 15(4), 325-354.
Heffner, A. G. (1981). Funded research, multiple authorship, and subauthorship collaboration in four disciplines. Scientometrics, vol. 3(1), 5-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02021860
Katz, J. S. (1994). Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, vol. 31(1), 31-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02018100
Katz, J. S.; Hicks, D. (1997). How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, vol. 40(3), 541-554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02459299
Katz, J. S.; Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, vol. 26(1), 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
Laudel, G. (2001). Collaboration, creativity and rewards: why and how scientists collaborate. International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 22(7-8), 762-781. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2001.002990
Laudel, G. (2002). What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation, vol. 11(1), 3-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154402781776961
Lee, S.; Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, vol. 35(5), 673-702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359
Lengwiler, M. (2008). Participatory Approaches in Science and Technology: Historical Origins and Current Practices in Critical Perspective. Science Technology Human Values, vol. 33(2), 186-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311262
Lepori, B.; Barré, R.; Filliatreau, G. (2008). New perspectives and challenges for the design and production of S&T indicators. Research Evaluation, vol. 17(1), 33-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/095820208X291176
Leydesdorff, L.; Ward, J. (2005). Science shops: a kaleidoscope of science–society collaborations in Europe. Public Understanding of Science vol. 14(4), 353–372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662505056612
Leydesdorff, L.; Sun, Y. (2009). National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 60(4), 778-788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20997
Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Science, vol. 16, 317-323.
Lukkonen, T.; Persson, O; Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration. Science, Technology and Human Values, vol. 17(1), 117-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224399201700106
Luna Morales, M.; Collazo Reyes, F. (2002). El síndrome «big science» y su influencia en el proceso de maduración de la Física mexicana de partículas elementales. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 25(4), 409-420.
Melin, G.; Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, vol. 36(3), 363-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02129600
Melin, G. (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization: research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy, vol. 29(1), 31-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00031-1
Monteiro; M.; Keating, E. (2009). Managing misunderstandings. the role of language in interdisciplinary scientific collaboration. Science Communication, vol. 31(1), 6-28.
Morillo, F.; Bordons, M.; Gómez, I. (2003). Interdisciplinarity in science: a tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 54(13), 1237-1249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.10326
Narin, F.; Stevens, K.; Whitlow, E. S. (1991). Scientific cooperation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics, vol. 21(3), 313-323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02093973
Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98(2), 404-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.404
Olmos Peñuela, J.; Castro-Martínez, E.; Fernández-Esquinas, M. (2014). Diferencias entre áreas científicas en las prácticas de divulgación de la investigación: un estudio empírico en el CSIC. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, vol. 42 (2), e040. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2014.2.1096
Padilla Navarro, P.; Curaqueo Pichihueche, O.; Cancino Salas, R.; Gatica Álvarez, M. (2013). Acceso a datos de investigación e información científica en Chile. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, vol. 36(3), en010. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2013.3.960
Park, H. W.; Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: the role of programmatic incentives. Research Policy, vol. 39(5), 640-649. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.009
Persson, O.; Glänzel, W.; Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: the role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, vol. 60(3), 421-432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034384.35498.7d
Pignatelli, B.; Maisonneuve, H.; Chapuis, F. (2005). Authorship ignorance: views of researchers in French clinical settings. Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 31(10), 578-581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.009449
Price, D. J. S. (1963). Little Science, Big Science. New York; Columbia University Press. p. 119.
Price, D. J. S. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, vol. 149(1965), 510-515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.149.3683.510
Price, D. J. S.; Beaver, D. (1966). Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologist, vol. 21(11), 1011-1018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0024051
Qin, J.; Lancaster, F. W.; Allen, B. (1997). Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 48(10), 893-916. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199710)48:10<893::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-X
Rafols, I.; Meyer, M. (2007). How cross-disciplinary is bionanotechnology? Explorations in the specialty of molecular motors. Scientometrics, vol. 70(3), 633-650. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0305-3
Rafols, I.; Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, vol. 82(2), 263-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0041-y
Rennie, D.; Flanagin, A. (1994). Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 271(6), 469-471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03510300075043
Robinson García, N.; Rodríguez Sánchez, R.; García, J.; Torres Salinas, D.; Fdez Valdivia, J. (2013). Análisis de redes de las universidades españolas de acuerdo a su perfil de publicación en revistas por áreas científicas. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, vol. 36(4), e027. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2013.4.1042
Ruiz Pérez, R.; Marcos Cartagena, D.; Delgao López-Cózar, E. (2014). La autoría científica en las áreas de ciencia y tecnología. Políticas internacionales y prácticas editoriales en las revistas científicas españolas. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, vol. 37(2), e049. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2014.2.1113
Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: a handbook. London; Sage Publications. p. 208.
Shrum, W.; Chompalov, I.; Genuth, J. (2001). Trust, conflict and performance in scientific collaborations. Social Studies of Science, vol. 31(5), 681-730. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631201031005002
Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, vol. 41(1), 643-681. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410121
Subramanyan, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: a review. Journal of Information Science, vol. 6(1), 33-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016555158300600105
Villanueva Félez, A.; Molas-Gallart, J.; Escribá Esteve, A. (2013). Measuring personal networks and their relationship with scientific production. Minerva, vol. 51(4), 465-483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11024-013-9239-5
Wagner, C. S.; Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, vol. 34(10), 1608-1618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.002
Wagner, C. S.; Roessner, J. D.; Bobb, K.; Klein, J. T.; Boyack, K. W.; Keyton, J.; Rafols, I.; Börner, K. (2011). Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): a review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, vol. 5(1), 14-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.004
Wagner-Döbler, R. (2001). Continuity and discontinuity of collaboration behaviour since 1800 - From a bibliometric point of view. Scientometrics, vol. 52(3), 503-517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1014208219788
Watts, D. J. (2004). The new Science of networks. Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 30(1), 243-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.020404.104342
Wray, K. B. (2002). The epistemic significance of collaborative research. Philosophy of Science, vol. 69, 150-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/338946
Ziman, J. 1996. Is science losing its objectivity? Nature, vol. 382: 751-754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/382751a0
Zuckerman, H. (1967). Nobel laureates in science: patterns of productivity, collaboration, and authorship. American Sociological Review, Vol 32(3), 391-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2091086
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.