Study of the accessibility of scientific documents in digital media
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2008.4.651Keywords:
acessibility, usability, blind people, disability, electronic journals, electronic edition, PDF, Acrobat, HTML, digital readingAbstract
This paper analyses the problems of accessibility posed by scientific articles published in digital format, focusing on the ease of use of their content with respect to the form in which they are published (irrespective of the recovery system). The two most widely used formats for the publication of scientific articles in digital format, HTML and PDF, are analysed, examining reader performance in relation to the presence of contents lists or internal or linked tables. The study involved two groups: 30 blind subjects, all JAWS users, contacted through the ONCE Foundation, and 30 sighted subjects, lecturers in the Department of Librarianship and Documentation of the University of Barcelona. The results shows the location of data in tables is easier in HTML documents through the inclusion of a contents list linked to these tables. Further, the inclusion of complete tables in the body of HTML document facilitates the reading activity of blind users. At the methodological level, this work reports two novelties with respect to the existing literature on usability by blind people: it examines the usability of the PDF format, and discusses a quantitative usability test. The latter hinders comparison with the majority of published articles.
Downloads
References
ADOBE (2004). PDF reference: Adobe portable document format version 1.6 (5th ed.). Adobe Systems Incorporated. http://www.adobe.com/devnet/pdf/pdfs/PDFReference16.pdf [Consulta: 14 febrero 2008].
ADOBE (2005). Creating accessible PDF documents with Adobe Acrobat 7.0. A guide for publishing PDF documents for use by people with disabilities. Adobe. 108 p. http://www.adobe.com/enterprise/accessibility/pdfs/acro7_pg_ue.pdf [Consulta: 14 febrero 2008].
Chen, X. (2005). Figures and tables omitted from online periodical articles: A comparison of vendors and information missing from full-text databases. Internet Reference Servi - ces Quarterly, vol. 10 (2), 75-88.
Clark, J. (2005a). Facts and opinions about PDF accessibility. A List Apart, vol. 201.
Clark, J. (2005b). Screen-reader usability study. http://joeclark.org/access/webaccess/survey/Screen-Reader-Usability.html [Consulta: 14 febrero 2008].
Dillon, A. (2004). Designing usable electronic text (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Evans, G.; Kurniawan, S. H.; Blenkhorn, P. L. (2003). Document format and layout for blind people: Problems and possible solutions. En: 7th European Conference for the Advan - cement of Assistive Technology, Dublin, Ireland. 456-460.
Gale, A. (1998). HCI research for blind users: A survey.
Hornbaek, K.; Frokjaer, E. (2001). Reading of electronic documents: The usability of linear, fisheye, and overview+detail interfaces. En: Conference on Human Factors in Com - puting Systems, 293-300.
Hornbaek, K.; Frokjaer, E. (2003). Reading patterns and usability in visualizations of electronic documents. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 10 (2), 119- 149. doi:10.1145/772047.772050
Kouroupetroglou, C.; Salampasis, M.; Manitsaris, A. (2007). Browsing shortcuts as a means to improve information seeking of blind people in the WWW. Universal Access in the Information Society, vol. 6 (3), 273-283. doi:10.1007/s10209-007-0090-z
Lazar, J. et al. (2007). What frustrates screen reader users on the web: a study of 100 blind users. International Journal of human-computer interaction, vol. 22 (3), 247-269.
Marchionini, G. (1995). Information Seeking in Electronic Environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morley, S. (1999). Auditory navigation in hyperspace: Design and evaluation of a non-visual hypermedia system for blind users. Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 18 (1), 18-26. doi:10.1080/014492999119219
Murphy, E.; Kuber, R.; Mcallister, G.; Strain, P.; Yu, W. (2007). An empirical investigation into the difficulties experienced by visually impaired internet users. Universal Access to Information Society, doi: 10.1007/s10209-007-0098-4.
O’Hara, K. (1996). Toward a typology of reading goals No. XRCE Technical Report No. EPC-1996-107. Xerox Research Centre Europe. http://www.xrce.xerox.com/Publications/Attachments/1996-107/EPC-1996-107.pdf [Consulta: 14 febrero 2008].
Pardo, A.; San Martín, R. (1994). Análisis de datos en psicología II. Madrid: Pirámide.
Pearson, R.; Van Schaik, P. (2003). The effect of spatial layout of and link colour in web pages on performance in a visual search task and an interactive search task. Internatio - nal Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 59 (3), 327-353. doi:10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00045-4
Petrie, H.; Fisher, W.; Langer, I.; Weber, G.; Gladstone, K.; Rundle, C.; Pyfers, L. (2002). Universal interfaces to multimedia documents. En: IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (4th), 319-324.
Petrie, H.; Morley, S.; Mcnally, P.; O’neill, A.M.; Majoe, D. (1997). Initial design and evaluation of an interface to hypermedia systems for blind users. En: ACM Conference on Hypertext (8th), 48-56.
Rho, Y. J.; Gedeon, T. D. (2000). Academic articles on the web: Reading patterns and formats. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 12 (2), 219-240. doi:10.1207/S15327590IJHC1202_4
Riedel, S.; Wünschmann, W. (2004). Evaluation of a web based information system for blind and visually impaired students: A descriptive study. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3206, 611-619.
Romero Zúnica, R.; Ávila Clemente, V.; Alcantud Marín, F. (2001). Análisis de la accesibilidad y usabilidad de páginas web para usuarios ciegos. En: ISAAC 2001: Odisea de la Comunicación. Segundas Jornadas sobre Comunicación Aumentativa y Alternativa.
Souto, V. T.; Dyson, M. C. (2004). Location of the table of contents in web documents: Same screen or separate screen. En: IADIS International Conference WWW/Internet 2004, vol. 1, 519-526.
Stewart, R.; Narendra, V.; Schmetzke, A. (2005). Accessibility and usability of online library databases. Library Hi Tech, vol. 23 (2), 265-286. doi:10.1108/07378830510605205
Theofanos, M.F.; Redish, J. (2003). Bridging the gap: between accessibility and usability. Interactions, vol. 10 (6), 36-51. doi:10.1145/947226.947227
W3C (1999). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. May 1999. http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/ [Consulta: 14 febrero 2008].
W3C (2006). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. W3C Working Draft 11 December 2007. http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/ [Consulta: 14 febrero 2008].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2008 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
