Comparative study of six National Scientific Dominions

Authors

  • M.ª Eugenia Espinosa-Calvo Universidad de Extremadura, Departamento Información y Comunicación, Scimago Research Group
  • Benjamín Vargas-Quesada Universidad de Granada Facultad de Biblioteconomía y Documentación, Scimago Research Group
  • Vicente P. Rosa Guerrero-Bote Universidad de Extremadura, Departamento Información y Comunicación, Scimago Research Group
  • Félix de Moya-Anegón CSIC, CCHS, IPP, Scimago Research Group, Spain.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2009.3.674

Keywords:

Materials Science, categories, cocitation, countries, scientograms

Abstract


This work analyses the area of materials science. Materials science has existed since the earliest civilizations. The development and evolution of societies has been intimately linked to the ability of their members to produce and shape materials to meet their needs. However, materials science has only recently been established as a recognised academic discipline, a consequence of the agglomeration of different areas of science. The citation habits and scientograms associated with this field could therefore be related to the scientific tradition and culture of each country. In this study, the citation networks of six of the most developed countries in the year 2002 were examined using a new technique that graphically represents these networks as scientograms. The technique makes use of cocitation between topic categories of the JCR to generate a network of categories which is graphically represented. The scientograms obtained, which represent the citation networks of each country examined, reflect the cultures of the different nations studied.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Garfield, E. Citation indexes for science. Science, n.º 122, pp. 108-111, 1955.

2. Price, D. S. Big Science, Little Science. Columbia University Press, New York, 1963.

3. Small, H. Cocitation in the scientific literature a new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1973, vol. 24, n.º 4, pp. 265-69.

4. Marshakova, V. System of document connections based on references. Nauchno-Tekhnichescaya Informatisya: Series II, 1973, vol. 6, pp. 3-8.

5. Small, H.; Griffi th, B. C. The structure of scientifi c literatures I: identifying and graphing specialities. Science Studies, 1974, vol. 4, pp. 17-40. doi:10.1177/030631277400400102

6. Guerrero-Bote, V. P.; Zapico-Alonso, F.; Espinosa-Calvo, M. E.; Gómez Crisóstomo, R.; Moya-Anegón F. Import-export of knowledge between scientific subjet categories: the iceberg hypothesis. Scientometrics, 2007, 71 (3), pp. 423-441. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1682-3

7. McCain, K. W. Mapping Authors in Intellectual Space: A Technical Overview Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1990, 41 (6), pp. 433-443. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<433::AID-ASI11>3.0.CO;2-Q

8. Guerrero-Bote, V. P.; Reyes-Barragán, M. J.; Moya-Anegón, F.; Herrero-Solana, V. Methods for the analysis of the uses of scientific information: The case of the University of Extremadura (1996-1997). LIBRI, 2002, 52 (2), pp. 99-109. doi:10.1515/LIBR.2002.99

9. Faba-Pérez, C.; Guerrero-Bote, V. P.; Moya-Anegón, F. Data mining in a closed Web environment. Scientometrics, 2003, 58 (3), pp. 623-640. doi:10.1023/B:SCIE.0000006884.08036.73

10. Börner, K.; Chen, C.; Boyack, K. W. Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 2003, pp. 179-255. doi:10.1002/aris.1440370106

11. Schvaneveldt, R. W. Pathfi nder Associative Networks. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1990.

12. Guerrero-Bote, V. P.; Zapico-Alonso, F.; Espinosa Calvo, M. E.; Gómez-Crisotómo, R.; Moya Anegón, F. Binay Pathfinder: an improvement of the Pathfinder Algorithm. Information Processing & Management, 2006, 42 (6), pp. 1484-90. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2006.03.015

13. Kamada, T.; Kawai, S. An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters, 1989, 31, pp. 7-15. doi:10.1016/0020-0190(89)90102-6

14. White, H. D. Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: a remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 2003, 54 (5), pp. 423-434. doi:10.1002/asi.10228

15. Moya Anegón, F.; Vargas-Quesada, B.; Herrero-Solana, V.; Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z.; Corera-Álvarez, E.; Muñoz-Fernández, F. J. A new technique for building maps of large scientific domains on the cocitation of classes and categories. Scientometrics, 2004, 61 (1), pp. 129-145. doi:10.1023/B:SCIE.0000037368.31217.34

16. Wikipedia. Materias Science. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Materials_science, consultado 24-11-2007.

17. Braun, T.; Glanzel, W.; Schubert, A. How balanced is the Science Citation Index’s journal coverage? a preliminary overview of macrolevel statistical data. En: Cronin, B.; Atkins, H. (editores). The web of knowledge: a festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield. Medford: ASIS, 2000.

18. Moya-Anegón, F.; Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z.; Corera-Álvarez, E.; Herrero-Solana, V.; Muñoz-Fernández, F. J. Vargas-Quesada, B. Indicadores bibliométricos de la actividad científica española-2004. FECYT. Madrid, 2005.

19. Eades, P. A Heuristic for Graph Drawing. Congressus Numerantium 42, pp. 149-160, 1984.

20. Fruchterman, T.; Reignold, E. Graph Drawing by Force-Directed Placement. Software. Practice and Experience, 1991, 21, pp. 1129-1164. doi:10.1002/spe.4380211102

21. Cohen, J. Drawing Graphs to Convey Proximity: An Incremental Arrangement Method. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 1997, 4: pp. 197-229. doi:10.1145/264645.264657

22. Krempel, L. Visualizing Networks with Spring Embedders: Two-mode and Valued Graphs. International Sunbelt Social Network Conference. Charleston, SC, 1999.

23. García Martínez, A. T.; Guerrero-Bote, V. P.; Vargas-Quesada, B.; Moya-Anegón, F. La Psicología en el dominio científico español a través de la cocitación de categorías del Journal Citation Report (JCR) 1990-2005. Psicothema, 2008, 20 (3), pp. 465-447.

Downloads

Published

2009-09-30

How to Cite

Espinosa-Calvo, M. E., Vargas-Quesada, B., Rosa Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & de Moya-Anegón, F. (2009). Comparative study of six National Scientific Dominions. Revista Española De Documentación Científica, 32(3), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2009.3.674

Issue

Section

Studies