Subject Classifications in Economics: Critical assessment and proposal for a general basic alternative

Authors

  • Valentín Edo-Hernández Departamento de Economía Aplicada. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales. Campus de Somosaguas. Universidad Complutense

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2010.4.760

Keywords:

Subject classification, economics subjects, economic literature, document searches, indexing

Abstract


This paper assesses the main subject classifications currently used in economics —Universal Decimal Classifi cation (UDC) and Journal of Economic Literature classifi cation (JEL)—, offers a design for a methodological procedure, and proposes a new subject classification. The new system was developed under the principles of comprehensiveness, universality, terminological accuracy, clarity in conceptual demarcations, simplicity, currency, and appropriateness to the subject divisions commonly used by economists. The proposed classification is developed only to the second hierarchical level, has 40 basic subject divisions and is innovative, although it maintains a close relationship to the main current classifications —UDC and JEL— as well as to the fi elds of knowledge defi ned by teaching and research programs in Spanish universities. Its aim is to improve the quality and efficiency of document handling and the effectiveness of the overall information system and, as such, assists two types of users: those who deal with bibliographic manterial on Economics by improving the speed and quality of their work (of organization, classification, indexing, etc.) and those who perform searches by facilitating the use and choice of subject terms and improving the accuracy of their search results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

CDU (2001). Clasificación Decimal Universal. Edición abreviada de la Norma UNE 50001:2000. Traducción del Master Reference File por el CINDOC, adaptada por Rosa San Segundo Manuel. Madrid. AENOR.

Clark, Colin (1957). The Conditions of Economic Progress. Londres: McMillan.

CSIC (2008). Tesauro ISOC de Economía (3.ª ed.). CINDOC. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.

Carrión Gútiez, Manuel (2002). Manual de Bibliotecas. Madrid: Fundación Germán Sánchez Ruipérez.

Consejo de Universidades (2010). Áreas de Conocimiento. (http://www.educacion.es/dctm/mepsyd/educacion/universidadesprofesorado/habilitacion/areas-conocimiento.pdf?documentId=0901e72b80050626.

Currás, Emilia (2004). Ontología Taxonomía y Tesaurus. Manual de construcción y uso (3.ª ed.). Madrid: Ediciones. Trea, S. L.

JEL (1991). Classifi cation System. The Journal of Economic Literature. (ISSN 0022 0515). The American Economic Association. Nashville.TN (actualizada en web. junio de 2010. http://www.aeaweb.org/journal/jel_class_system.php).

Martínez Sousa, José (1989). Diccionario de Bibliología de José Martínez Sousa. Madrid Fundación Germán Sanchez Ruiperez, Editorial Pirámide.

San Segundo Manuel, Rosa (1996). Sistemas de organización del conocimiento. La organización del conocimiento en las bibliotecas españolas. Monografía. Universidad Carlos III. Madrid. Boletín Oficial del Estado. SEC-95 (1996). Contabilidad Nacional de España. SEC-95. Reglamento (CE) n.º 2223/96 del Consejo de 25 de junio de 1996 relativo al sistema europeo de cuentas nacionales y regionales de la Comunidad Europea.

Downloads

Published

2010-12-30

How to Cite

Edo-Hernández, V. (2010). Subject Classifications in Economics: Critical assessment and proposal for a general basic alternative. Revista Española De Documentación Científica, 33(4), 600–623. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2010.4.760

Issue

Section

Studies