Análisis de la Producción Científica sobre Ecosistemas Empresariales

Álvaro Fabricio Ramírez-Campos; Mariana Marcelino-Aranda; Luis Roberto Domínguez-Aguirre; Alejandro D. Camacho

doi:10.3989/redc.2020.3.1659

Autores/as

Álvaro Fabricio Ramírez-Campos Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Superior de Comercio y Administración, Unidad Santo Tomás. CDMX - Instituto Tecnológico José Mario Molina Pasquel y Henríquez https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3544-7526
Mariana Marcelino-Aranda Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Unidad Profesional Interdisciplinaria de Ingeniería y Ciencias Sociales y Administrativas. DMX https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4997-0617
Luis Roberto Domínguez-Aguirre Instituto Tecnológico José Mario Molina Pasquel y Henríquez https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5212-983X
Alejandro D. Camacho Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas. CDMX https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4791-1912

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2020.3.1659

Palabras clave:

Ecosistemas, empresas, ecosistema empresarial, estrategia, análisis bibliométrico

Resumen

El enfoque de los ecosistemas empresariales (EE) puede ser una alternativa sostenible de las actividades económicas. El objetivo fue desarrollar un estudio bibliométrico sobre EE a partir de la Web of Science. Se encontraron 272 documentos publicados entre 1991 y mayo 2019, con picos de producción en 2007 y 2017. Se construyeron las redes temáticas, registros y productividad por fuentes, países, instituciones, palabra clave, h-index, co-autoría y co-citas. Se encontraron 587 autores, de 53 países. Las revistas más productivas tienen altos niveles de impacto. China produce el mayor número de publicaciones, pero Estados Unidos y Reino Unido tienen el mayor número de citas. Innovación y estrategia son temas relacionados con EE. Aunque existen diferentes perspectivas y la base conceptual de los EE está todavía en discusión, algunos países orientales ya están en la implementación. Los EE tienen un alto potencial de aplicación para el desarrollo sostenible a gran escala.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Adner, R.; Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31 (3), 306-333. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.821

Cadavid, L.; Awad, G.; Franco, C. J. (2012). Análisis bibliométrico del campo modelado de difusión de innovaciones. Estudios Gerenciales, 28, 213-236. https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2012.1486

Cortés, D. (2007). Medir la producción científica de los investigadores universitarios: la bibliometría y sus límites. Revista de la Educación Superior, 36 (142), 43-65.

Faucheux, S.; Nicolaï, I. (2011). IT for green and green IT: A proposed typology of eco-innovation. Ecological Economics, 70 (11), 2020-2027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.019

Harzing, A.; van der Wal, R. (2007). A Google Scholar H-Index for Journals: A Better Metric to Measure Journal Impact in Economics & Business? Academy of Management Annual Meeting, August 8-13, 2008 - Anaheim, California.

Iansiti, M.; Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82, 68-81.

Jeong, S.-G.; Roh, J.-S.; Stang, W. (2014). Shared Growth in LG Electronics: Developing a Conceptual Model. Korea Business Review, 18 (4), 27-58.

Joo, J.; Shin, M. M.; Eom, M. T.-I. (2014). Business Ecosystems as a New Source of Competitiveness and a Role of Social Capital. The Journal of Information System, 23 (4), 93-117. https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2014.23.4.93

Joo, J.; Shin, M. M. (2014). Customer Participation Driven Sustainable Business Ecosystems. Journal of Distribution Science, 12 (12), 83-92. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.12.12.201412.83

Joo, J.; Eom, M. T.; Shin, M. M. (2016). Executive practices for corporate sustainability: a business ecosystems perspective. International Journal of Business Research, 16(1), 133-146. https://doi.org/10.18374/IJBR-16-1.8

Joo, J.; Eom, M. T.; Shin, M. M. (2017). Finding the Missing Link between Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Competitiveness through Social Capital: A Business Ecosystem Perspective. Sustainability, 9, 707. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050707

Kapoor, R.; Furr, N. R. (2014). Complementarities and competition: Unpacking the drivers of entrants' technology choices in the solar photovoltaic industry. Strategic Management Journal, 36 (3), 416-436. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2223

Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago.

Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and Prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71 (3), 75-86.

Moore, J. F. (1996). The death of competition: leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. New York: HarperBusiness.

Moore, J. F. (2006). Business ecosystems and the view from the firm. The Antitrust Bulletin, 51 (1), 31-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X0605100103

Park, S.-H.; Kim, C.-O. (2011). Competitiveness Enrichment of IT Venture Business through the Industry-University Cooperation in Gyeongnam. Journal of Digital Convergence, 9 (6), 125-135.

Peltoniemi, M.; Vuori, E. (2004). Business ecosystem as the new approach to complex adaptive business environments. Proceedings of Business Research Forum 2, 267-281.

Peltoniemi, M. (2006). Preliminary theoretical framework for the study of business ecosystems. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 8 (1). Disponible en: https://journal.emergentpublications.com/article/preliminary-theoretical-framework-for-the-study-of-business-ecosystems/ [Fecha de consulta: 01/02/2019].

Porter, M. E.; van der Linde, C. (1995a). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73 (5), 97-118.

Porter, M. E.; van der Linde, C. (1995b). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspective, 9 (4), 97- 118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97

Ratza, C. A. (1996). The Great Lakes Information Network: The region's Internet information service. Toxicology and Industrial Health, 12 (3-4), 557-561. https://doi.org/10.1177/074823379601200327 PMid:8843572

Shaw, D. R.; Allen, T. F. H. (2011). Observational decisions and metaphors in the theory construction process: The business ecosystem metaphor. Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the ISSS-2011, 55 (1), 1-17.

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (13), 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640

Tsujimoto, M.; Kajikawa, Y.; Tomita, J.; Matsumoto, Y. (2018). A review of the ecosystem concept towards coherent ecosystem design. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.032

Van Eck, N. J.; Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VoSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84 (2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 PMid:20585380 PMCid:PMC2883932

Wu, Q.; Wang, L. (2010). The Study of Family Business Ecosystem. China 2010 Family Business Forum: Opportunities and Challenges of Family Business.

Xie, X.-M.; Lv, T.; Liu, G.-J. (2008). The Research on Telecommunication Industry Business Ecosystem. 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 6727-6731. https://doi.org/10.1109/WiCom.2008.1590

Yan, H.; Yan, P.; Ma, L. (2009). Study on the Performance of Core Enterprise in Business Ecosystem Based on AHP-FCE. International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management, and Industrial Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIII.2009.364

Yu, J.; Lee, K.; Choi, M.; Zo, H. (2012). Strategies and Policies for Developing ICT Ecosystems. The Journal of Korea Information and Communications Society, 37B (11), 1058-1071. https://doi.org/10.7840/kics.2012.37B.11.1058