Who is author? Multiple authorships, criteria and guidelines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2021.2.1758Keywords:
author, authorship, multiple authors, research integrity, ethics on publicationsAbstract
This paper aims are: 1. Highlighting the most common unethical practices regarding authorship in scientific publications, 2. Tracing authorship criteria from most respectful academic sources and 3. Making recommendations to deal with multiple authored papers. To achieve this, a review was made on those articles obtained through a search on Pubmed and Scopus databases with the terms “authorship”, “authorship guidelines” and “multiple authors”. From this, the more common unethical practices and the most acknowledged sources of guidelines were identified, most of them coming from relevant medical associations: International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), Council Science Editors (CSE), The World Association of Medical Editors (WAME), National Institutes of Health (NIH), The American Psychological Association (APA) y The Center for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, Sidney University – VELiM (SEH). Given that most of those guidelines are inapplicable in practice, a more complete view is needed, where all the parts involved will take some responsibility. It is required that financial organizations, scientific institutions, publisher, editors and researchers take some action to assure research quality and true information, without metrics interference.
Downloads
References
Aad, G. et al. (2015). A measurement of the Higgs boson mass is presented based on the combined data samples of the ATLAS. Physical Review Letters, 114(9), 1-33.
All European Academies (ALLEA). (2017). European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Disponible en: https://www.allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/
ALLEA-European-Code-of-Conduct-for-Research-Integrity-2017.pdf [Fecha de Consulta: 12/4/2020].
Angell, M. (1994). Publish or perish: a proposal. Annals of Internal Medicine, 104(2), 261-262. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-104-2-261 PMid:3946958
APA Science Student Council. (2006). A Graduate Student's Guide to Determining Authorship Credit. Disponible en: https://www.apa.org/science/leadership/students/authorship-paper.pdf [Fecha de consulta: 17/7/2019].
Baethge, C. (2008). Publish Together or Perish. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 105(20), 380-383. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2008.0380 PMid:19626176 PMCid:PMC2696880
Bailar, J. (1986). Science, Statistics and Deception. Annals of Internal Medicine, 104(2), 259 - 260. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-104-2-259 PMid:3946957
Belwalkar, B. y Toaddy, S. (2014). Authorship Determination Scorecard. Disponible en: https://www.apa.org/science/leadership/students/authorship-determination-scorecard.pdf [Fecha de consulta: 14/6/2019].
Bemmet, D. y Taylor, D. (2003). Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers. Emergency Medicine, 15(3), 263-270. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00432.x PMid:12786648
Bhaskar, E. (2010). Guest authorship: the practice of author pooling. Open Medicina, 4(1). Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3116671/ [Fecha de consulta: 16/05/2020]
BigTenCRC - Big Cancer Research Consortium (2019). Clinical Research. Disponible en: https://www.bigtencrc.org/clinical-research [Fecha de consulta: 16/6/2019].
BMJ. (1995). World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) launched. 310(761) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6982.761a
Broad, W. J. (1983). Notorious Darsee case shakes assumptions about science. New York Times. Disponible en: https://www.nytimes.com/1983/06/14/science/notorious-darsee-case-shakes-assumptions-about-science.html [Fecha de consulta: 16/6/2020].
CASRAI. (2019). CRediT - Contributor Roles Taxonomy. Disponible en: https://casrai.org/credit/ [Fecha de consulta: 10/4/2020].
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. (2016). Guía de buenas prácticas de las publicaciones periódicas y unitarias de la Agencia Estatal Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Disponible en: http://revistas.csic.es/public/guia_buenas_practicas_CSIC.pdf [Fecha de consulta 15/4/2020].
COPE - Committee on Publications Ethics - (2006). What to do if you suspect ghost, guest of gift authorship. Disponible en: https://publicationethics.org/files/Ghost.pdf [Fecha de consulta: 18/4/2020].
COPE - Committee on Publications Ethics. (2018). How to recognize potential authorship problems. Disponible en: [Fecha de consulta: 18/4/2020]
COPE - Committee on Publications Ethics (2019). Principles of Transparency and Best Practice on Scholarly Publishing. Disponible en: https://publicationethics.org/node/19881 www.publicationethics.org [Fecha de consulta 19/4/2020].
CPRE - Consortium for Policy Research in Education (2020). Overview. Disponible en: https://www.cpre.org/: https://www.cpre.org/overview [Fecha de consulta: 18/6/2020].
CSE - Council Science Editors (2012). White Paper on Publication Ethics. Disponible en: https://www.councilscienceeditors.org/resource-library/editorial-policies/white-paper-on-publication-ethics/ [Fecha de consulta: 13/6/2019].
CSE - Council Science Editors. (2020). History of CSE. Disponible en: https://www.councilscienceeditors.org/about/history-of-cse/ [Fecha de consulta: 8/4/2020].
Culliton, B. (1983). Coping with fraud: the Darsee Case. Science, 220(4592), 31-35. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6828878 PMid:6828878
Da Silva, J. y Dobráski, J. (2016). How Authorship is DeUned by Multiple Publishing Organizations and STM Publishers. 23(2), 97 - 122. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2015.1047927 PMid:26191641
Da Silva, T. (2015). Multiple Authorship in Scientific Manuscripts: Ethical. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1457-1472.
Das, K. V., Patil, S., Ray, J., Deepak, K. (2016). Knowledge on ethical authorship: A comparative study between medical and pharmacy faculty. Journal of Youth Pharmacists, 8(2), 136-140. https://doi.org/10.5530/jyp.2016.2.15
ELSEVIER (2019). Factsheet: Authorship. Disponible en: https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/653883/Authorship-factsheet-March-2019.pdf [Fecha de consulta 8/4/2020].
Fetters, M., y Elwym, T. (1997). Authorsip. Assesment of authorship depend on culture. BMJ, 315(7110), 747-747. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7110.744
Fields, C. (1983). Professors' demands for credit as coauthors of students' research projects may be rising. Chronicle of Higher Education, págs. 7,10.
Fletcher, R. (2005). Ghost writing initiated by commercial companies. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20(6), 549-549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.41015.x PMid:15987333 PMCid:PMC1490135
Gaeta, T. (1999). Authorship: "Law and oder". Academic Emergency Medicine, 6(4), 297-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00393.x
PMid:10230981
Harvey, L. (2018). Gift, honorary or guest authorship. Spinal Cord, 56(9). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-017-0057-8 PMid:29422533
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., Sarah, D., y Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 429-431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a PMid:25903611
Hosseini, M. y Gordijn, B. (2020). A review of the literature on ethical issues related to scientific authorship, Accountability in Research, https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1750957 PMid:32243214
ICMJE - International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2019). Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. Disponible en: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html [Fecha de consulta: 2/2/2019].
ICMJE - International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2019). Who is an Author? Disponible en: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html#two [Fecha de consulta: 2/2/2019].
ICMJE. (2020). International Committe of Medical Journal Editors. About ICMJE. Disponible en: http://www.icmje.org/about-icmje/ [Fecha de consulta: 8/4/2020].
Koseoglu, M. (2016). Growth and structure of authorship and co-authorship network in the strategic management realm: Evidence from the Strategic Management Journal. Business Research Quarterly, 19(3), 153-170.¡ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2016.02.001
Kuld, L. y O'Hagan, J. (2017). The trend of increasing co-authorship in economics: New evidence. VOX. Disponible en: https://voxeu.org/article/growth-multi-authored-journal-articles-economics [Fecha de consulta: 20/5/2020]
Leiden Manifiesto for Research Metrics. (2015). Disponible en: http://www.leidenmanifesto.org/ [Fecha de consulta 20/5/2019].
Loannidis, J., Klavans, R. y Boyack, K. (2018). Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days. Nature (561), 167-169. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06185-8 PMid:30209384
Mallapaty, S. (2018). Paper authorship goes hyper. Nature Index, Disponible en: www.natureindex.com: https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/paper-authorship-goes-hyper [Fecha de consulta: 18/6/2019].
McNutt, M. , Bradford M., Drazan, J., Hadson, B., Howard, B. (2018). Trasnparency in authors'contribucions and resposablities to promote integrity in scientificc publication. National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2557-2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115 PMid:29487213 PMCid:PMC5856527
Michaela, P. (2016). Credit where credit is due: best practices for authorship attribution. Disponible en: https://www.aje.com/dist/docs/Authorship_Attribution_EN.pdf [Fecha de consulta: 15/4/2021].
Misra, D. P. (2018). Integrity of Authorship and Peer Review Practices: Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 33(46), e287. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e287 PMid:30416407 PMCid:PMC6221861
National Human Genome Research Institute. (2019). The Human Research Project. Disponible en: https://www. genome.gov/human-genome-project [Fecha de consulta: 15/3/2019].
Nature (2020). Authorship. Disponible en: https://www.nature.com/nature-research/editorial-policies/authorship [Fecha de consulta: 10/4/2020].
NIH - National Institute of Health. (2020). Who we are. Disponible en: www.nih.gov: https://www.nih.gov/aboutnih/who-we-are [Fecha de consulta: 16/4/2020].
Over, R. y Smallman, S. (1970). Citation Idiosyncrasies. Nature, 228(5278), 1357-1357. https://doi.org/10.1038/2281357a0
PeRC - Pediatric Research Consortium (2019). Current Projects. Disponible en: https://perc.research.chop.edu/?q=listing [fecha de consulta: 15/3/2019].
Phillippi, J., Likis, F., & Tilden, E. (2018). Authorship Grids: Practical tools to facilitate coallaboration and ethical publication. Research in Nursing & Health, 41(2), 195-208. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21856 PMid:29603766 PMCid:PMC7608625
PlosOne. (2019). Autorship. Disponible en: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/authorship [Fecha de consulta: 11/4/2020].
Pritychenco, B. (2015). Fractional authorship in nuclear physics. 106(1), 461-468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1766-4
Rennie, D., Yank, V., Emmanuel, L. (1997). When authorship fail. A proposal to make contributors accountable. JAMA, 278(7), 579-585. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.278.7.579 PMid:9268280
Ruíz-Pérez, R., Marcos-Cartanega, D., Delgado López-Cozar, E. (2014). La autoría científica en las áreas de ciencia y tecnología. Políticas internacionales y prácticas editoriales en las revistas científicas españolas.Revista Española de Documentación Cientí7ca, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2014.2.1113
San Francisco Declaration on Research Assesment. (2019). Disponible en: www.sfdora.org [Fecha de consulta: 4/5/2019]
Schmidt, M., Fecher, B. y Kobsda, C. (2017). How many authors does it really need to write a paper? Elephant in the lab. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.818231
Sismondo, S. (2005). Ghost Management: How Much of the Medical Literature Is Shaped Behind the Scenes by the Pharmaceutical Industry? PLoS Med, 4(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040286 PMid:17896859 PMCid:PMC1989751
Smith, J. (1994). Gift authorship: a poisoned chalice? (J.Smith, Ed.) The BJM, 309, 1456-1457. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6967.1456 PMid:7804037 PMCid:PMC2541639
Sydney University. (2020). Research Publications and Outputs. Disponible en: https://ses.library.usyd. edu.au/handle/2123/10565 [Fecha de consulta:9/4/2020]
Taylor and Francis Group. (2017). Co-Authorship in the humanities and Social Sciences. A Global View. Disponible en: https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Coauthorship-white-paper.pdf [Fecha de consulta: 15/4/2020].
The Center for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine -VELIM. (2011). Guidelines on Collaborative Research and Authorship. Disponible en: https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/13253 [Fecha de consulta: 10/6/2019]
The PLoS Medicine Editors. (2009). Ghostwriting: The Dirty Little Secret of Medical Publishing That Just Got Bigger. Plos Med, 6(9). e1000156. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000156 PMid:19901975 PMCid:PMC2734179
UKPC. (2019). What UKPC Does. Disponible en: https://www.ukcp.ac.uk/pmwiki.php/UKCP/WhatUKCPDoes [Fecha de consulta: 15/3/2019]
WAME - The World Association of Medical Editors (2019). Recommendations on Publication Ethic Policies for Medical Journals. Disponible en: http://wame.org/recommendations-on-publication-ethics-policies-for-medical-journals [Fecha de consulta 16/6/2020]
Winston, R. B. (1985). A suggested Procedure for Determining Order of Authorship Research in Publications, Journal of Counseling and Development, 63, 515 - 518. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1985.tb02749.x
Zuckerman, H. (1968). Patterns of Name Ordering Among Author of Scientific Papers: A Study of Social Symbolism and Its Ambiguity. American Journal of Sociology, 74(3), 276-291. https://doi.org/10.1086/224641
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
