Digital Transformation in the methods and subjects of the Brazilian Library and Information Science research (2010-2019)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2021.2.1763Keywords:
subject analysis, content analysis, SSCI-WoS, Brazil, journal articles, Library and Information Science, digital transformationAbstract
From the Social Sciences Citation Index database, those Brazilian scientific articles that address issues, methods and consequences of digital transformation into LIS, in the 2010-2019 interval are identified. Dynamic tables are elaborated with the titles and keywords of the 1039 retrieved articles. The categorization of the titles is done by experts, while for the keywords, the n-grams model is used along with the Fruchterman-Reingold filter. Their co-occurrences are visualized in clusters elaborated with the Louvain method of community detection. The results are presented in tables and commented graphics on the internationalization, co-authorship and interdisciplinarity of the articles, together with the research techniques followed in them. In The thematic progression of those that refer to the Digital environment is studied. An abundant and significant contribution of the Brazilian authors to the study of the effects that the digital scenarios cause in the information sector is observed.
Downloads
References
Arboit, A. E.; Bufrem, L. S.; Moreiro-González, J. A. (2011). A produção brasileira em Ciência da Informação no exterior como reflexo de institucionalização científica. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 16 (3),75-92. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-99362011000300005
Åström, F. (2007). Changes in the LIS research front: Time‐sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990-2004. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (7), 947-957. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20567
Bauer, J.; Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L. (2016). Highly cited papers in Library and Information Science (LIS): Authors, institutions, and network structures. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67 (12), 3095-3100. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23568
Bufrem, L.S.; Silva, H. N.; Fabian, C.; Sorribas, T. (2007). Produção científica em Ciência da Informação: análise temática. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 12, (1), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-99362007000100004
Cooper, H. (2003). Editorial. Psychological Bulletin, 129, (1), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.3
Cronin, B. (2012). The waxing and waning of a field: reflections on information studies education. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 17, (3), paper 529. Disponible en: http://InformationR.net/ir/17-3/paper529.html [Fecha de consulta: 18/08/2019].
De-Araújo, R. Ferreira; Oliveira, M. (2015). A tecnologia na pesquisa no ensino da Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação no Brasil: representações, conteúdos e práticas. Pesquisa brasileira em Ciência da Informação e Biblioteconomia, 10, (2), 64-72. Disponible en: http://www.periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs/index.php/pbcib/article/view/24932 [Fecha de consulta: 17/06/2019].
De-Filippo, D. (2013). Spanish scientific output in Communication sciences in WOS. The Scientific Journals in SSCI (2007-12). Comunicar, 21, (41), 25-34. [Fecha de consulta: 20/02/2020]. https://doi.org/10.3916/C41-2013-02
Del-Canto, E.; Sánchez, P.; Martins, V. F.; Soares, A. B. (2014). Agentes generadores de innovación en las empresas: gestión del conocimiento y TIC. Revista de Auditoria, Governança e Contabilidade, 2, (3), 72-88. Disponible en: http://fucamp.edu.br/editora/index.php/ragc/article/viewFile/465/334 [Fecha de consulta: 21/04/2020].
De-Oliveira, E.T. (2018). Estudos Métricos da Informação no Brasil: Indicadores de produção, colaboração, impacto e visibilidade. Marília: Editora da UNESP.
De-Souza, C.-D. (2018). Impacto de las políticas brasileñas de ciencia y tecnología en la actividad investigadora de las universidades federales: un estudio cienciométrico del período 2003-2015. Madrid: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid [Tesis doctoral]. Disponible en: https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/bitstream/handle/10016/27815/souza_tesis_2018.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [Fecha de consulta:11/06/2019 ].
Dias, F. S. (2008). Análise das relações interdisciplinares das pesquisas científicas em sistemas de informação. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 13, (1), 199-215. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pci/v13n1/v13n1a13 [Fecha de consulta:08/08/2019]. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-99362008000100013
Do-Amaral, S. A. (2011). Marketing da informação: abordagem inovadora para entender o mercado e o negócio da informação. Ciência da Informação, 40, (1), 85-98. Disponible en: http://revista.ibict.br/ciinf/article/view/1327 [Fecha de consulta:11/07/2019]. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-19652011000100007
Dueñas, J. C.; Burillo, V.; Ruiz, J. L. (2005). Professional ICT Profiles to Implement Services and Digital Content. Madrid: Colegio Oficial de Ingenieros de Telecomunicación. PAFET 4. Disponible en: https://www.coit.es/informes/pafet-4-perfiles-profesionales-tic-para-la--implantacion-de-servicios-y-contenidos-digital-0 [Fecha de consulta: 03/06/2019].
Feldman, R.; Sanger, J. (2007). The Text Mining Handbook: Advanced Approaches in Analyzing Unstructured Data. New York, Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546914
Ferrán-Ferrer, N.; Guallar, J.; Abadal, E. Server, A. (2017). Research methods and techniques in Spanish Library and Information science journals (2012-2014). Information research, 22, (1), paper 741. http://InformationR.net/ir/22-1/paper741.html
Fleischmann, K. (2007). Digital libraries with embedded values: Combining insights from LIS and science and technology studies. The Library Quarterly, 77, (4), 409-427. https://doi.org/10.1086/520997
FTI-AMETIC (2012). Estudio de Perfiles Profesionales más demandados en el ámbito de los Contenidos Digitales en España 2012-2017. Profesionales TIC. Madrid: Fundación de Tecnologías de la Información-AMETIC. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93528051014 [Fecha de consulta:02/02/2020].
Gajdoš, P.; Ježowicz, T.; Uher, V.; Dohnálek, P. (2016). A parallel Fruchterman-Reingold algorithm optimized for fast visualization of large graphs and swarms of data. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 26, (February), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2015.07.006
Garfield, E. (1983). Mapping science in the third world. Science and Public Police, 10, (3), 112-127. https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/10.3.112
Garvey, W. (1979). Communication: the essence of science: facilitating information exchange among librarians, scientists, engineers and students. Oxford: Pergamon I. Library.
Georgia Institute of Technology. (1962). Proceedings of the conference on Training Science Information specialists, October 12-13, 1961. Atlanta. Sponsored by the National Science Foundatio Dorothy M. Crosland, General Chairma 139 pp.
Gorbea Portal, S. (1998). Modelación matemática de la actividad bibliotecaria: una revisión. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 12, (24), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.22201/iibi.0187358xp.1998.24.3869
Humphreys, B.; Lindberg, D.; Schoolman, H.; Barnett, O. (1998). The unified medical language system: an informatics research collaboration. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 5, (1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.1998.0050001 PMid:9452981 PMCid:PMC61271
Hurd, J. M. (2000). The transformation of scientific communication: A model for 2020. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, (14), 1279-1283. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1044>3.0.CO;2-1
IUNE. 2019. Mediana de autores por documento por categoría WoS y año (SUE 2008-2017). Madrid; IUNE. Disponible en: http://www.iune.es/es_ES/informes [Fecha de consulta:05/07/2019].
Järvelin, K.; Vakkari, P. (1993). The evolution of library and information science 1965-1985: A content analysis of journal articles. Information Processing & Management, 29, (1), 129-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(93)90028-C
Jacsó, P. (2009). Five-year impact factor data in the Journal Citation Reports. Online Information Review, 33, (3), 603-14. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520910969989
Kroll-do-Prado, J. M.; Pinto, A. L. (2018). Marketing in Brazilian Information Science: four decades of production. Informação& Sociedade: estudos, 28, (3), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.1809-4783.2018v28n3.37935
Leydesdorff, L.; Wouters, P. (1999). Between texts and contexts: advances in theories of citation? Scientometrics, 44, (2), 173-192. Disponible en: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF02457378.pdf [Fecha de consulta:08/08/2019]. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457378
Liew, A. (2007). Understanding data, information, knowledge and their inter-relationships. Journal of knowledge Management Practice, 8, (2), 1-16. Disponible en: https://socygu.ga/1549290980.pdf [Fecha de consulta: 15/08/2019].
Marteleto, R. (2009). A pesquisa em Ciência da Informação no Brasil: marcos institucionais, cenários e perspectivas. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 14, (3), 19-40. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-99362009000400003
Matt, C.; Hess, T; Benlian, A. (2015). Digital Transformation Strategies. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 57, 339-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0401-5
Moreiro-González; J. A. (2018). Reciprocidad laboral, formativa y difusora entre Información-Documentación y Comunicación social. Anuario ThinkEPI, 12, 90-95. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2018.08
Papadopoulos, S.; Kompatsiaris, Y.; Vakali, A.; Spyridonos, P. (2012). Community detection in social media. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 24, (3), 515-554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-011-0224-z
Pettigrew, K.; McKechnie, L. (2001). The use of theory in information science research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, (1), 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/1532-2890(2000)52:1<62::AID-ASI1061>3.0.CO;2-J
Piñuel Raigada, J. L. (2002). Epistemología, metodología y técnicas del análisis de contenido. Sociolinguistic Studies 3 (1), 1-42.
Pinheiro, L. V. R.; Brascher, M.; Burnier, S. (2005). Ciência da Informação: 32 anos (1972-2004) no caminho da história e horizontes de um periódico científico brasileiro. Ciência da Informação, 34, (3), 38-49. Disponible en: http://revista.ibict.br/ciinf/article/ viewFile/1084/1187 [Fecha de consulta:27/06/2019]. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-19652005000300003
Pinto, A. L.; Matias, M.; Moreiro-González, J. A. (2016). Produção brasileira da Ciência da Informação na Web of Science entre 1994 e 2013 e a lista Qualis/Capes da Área. Ibersid, 10, (1), 51-61. Disponible en: https://www.ibersid.eu/ojs/index.php/ibersid/article/view/4252 [Fecha de consulta: 08/08/2019].
Población, D. A.; De-Oliveira, M. (2006). Input e output: insumos para o desenvolvimento da pesquisa. En: Población, D. A.; Witter, G.; Da Silva, J. F. M. Comunicação & produção científica: contexto, indicadores e avaliação. São Paulo: Angellara, 57-80.
Risso, V. G. (2012) Aproximación teórica a la relación entre los términos gestión documental, gestión de información y gestión del conocimiento. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 35, (4), 531-554. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2012.4.869
Romero, E. (2019). Países de América con mayor cantidad de profesionales SEO. Karai digital. Disponible en: https://www.karaidigital.com/blog/ profesionales-especialistas-seo-america [Fecha de consulta:18/08/2019].
Sánchez-Vigil, J. M.; Marcos-Recio, J. C.; Olivera-Zaldu; M. (2015). Producción científica sobre Comunicación y Medios en las revistas de Documentación (2000-2014). Revista Española de Documantación Científica. 38, (4), e108. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2015.4.1257
Sayão, L. F.; Marcondes, C. H. (2008). O desafio da interoperabilidade e as novas perspectivas para as bibliotecas digitais. Transinformação, 20, (2), 133-148. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3843/384334798002.pdf [Fecha de consulta:21/08/2019]. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-37862008000200002
Vivaldi, J.; Rodríguez, H. 2007. Evaluation of terms and term extraction systems: A practical approach. Terminology, 13 (2). 225-248. https://doi.org/10.1075/term.13.2.06viv
Wasserman, S.; Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478
Wellisch, H. (1972). From Information Science to Informatics: a terminological investigation. Journal of Librarianship, 4, (3), 157-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/096100067200400302
White, M.; Marsh, E. (2006). Content analysis: a flexible methodology. Library trends, 55, (1), 22-45. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0053
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
Funding data
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Grant numbers 2018-02595-8
