Article Processing Charge or Article Prestige Charge? An Empirical Analysis of Medical Journals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2025.1.1580Keywords:
APC charges, Open Acess, Biliometrics, Citescore, StatisticsAbstract
The Article Processing Charges (APC) are fees paid to publishers for the open-access publication of scientific articles. During the study period, which comprised the years 2019 and 2020, a total of 2,870 medical journals were examined to analyze APCs. Significant variability in APCs within medical journals was observed, with a range between 0 and 8,900 USD. The average APC during this period was 3,128 USD. A positive correlation was estimated between the journal's quality index and the APC, where an additional point in the CiteScore implied an increase of between 65 and 75 USD in the APC. It was found that publications in Spanish have lower APC than Italian or French ones. It is estimated that the CiteScore explains between 38% and 64% of the marginal variation between journals in adjacent quartiles. It is concluded that the journal's reputation has a greater effect than previously documented in the literature on the relative variation of the APC.
Downloads
References
Andersen, J. P. (2023). Field-level differences in paper and author characteristics across all fields of science in Web of Science, 2000-2020. Quantitative Science Studies, 4(2), 394-422.
Bauchner, H. (2017). The rush to publication: An editorial and scientific mistake. In JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, 318 (12), 1109-1110. American Medical Association.
Bauchner, H., Golub, R. M., y Fontanarosa, P. B. (2016). Data sharing: An ethical and scientific imperative. In JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association 315 (12), 1237-1239. American Medical Association.
Bendezú-Quispe, G., Nieto-Gutiérrez, W., Pacheco-Mendoza, J., y Taype-Rondan, A. (2016). Sci-Hub and medical practice: an ethical dilemma in Peru. In The Lancet Global Health, 4(9) e608. Elsevier Ltd. DOI:
Björk, B. C. (2012). The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles: A failed experiment? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1496-1504.
Björk, B. C. (2017). Growth of hybrid open access, 2009-2016. PeerJ, 2017(9).
Björk, B. C., y Solomon, D. (2015). Article processing charges in OA journals: relationship between price and quality. Scientometrics, 103(2), 373-385.
Blinder, A. S. (1973). Wage Discrimination: Reduced Form and Structural Estimates. The Journal of Human Resources, 8(4), 436-455.
Boudry, C., Alvarez-Muñoz, P., Arencibia-Jorge, R., Ayena, D., Brouwer, N. J., Chaudhuri, Z., Chawner, B., Epee, E., Erraïs, K., Fotouhi, A., et al. (2019). Worldwide inequality in access to full text scientific articles: The example of ophthalmology. PeerJ, 2019(10).
Budzinski, O., Grebel, T., Wolling, J., y Zhang, X. (2020). Drivers of article processing charges in open access. Scientometrics, 124(3), 2185-2206.
Butler, L.-A., Matthias, L., Simard, M.-A., Mongeon, P., y Haustein, S. (2023). The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers’ profit from article processing charges. Quantitative Science Studies, 1-22.
Cortegiani, A., Longhini, F., Sanfilippo, F., Raineri, S. M., Gregoretti, C., y Giarratano, A. (2019). Predatory open-access publishing in anesthesiology. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 128(1), 182-187.
Cortegiani, A., Sanfilippo, F., Tramarin, J., y Giarratano, A. (2019). Predatory open-access publishing in critical care medicine. Journal of Critical Care, 50, 247-249.
Dove, C., Chan, T. M., Thoma, B., Roland, D., y Bruijns, S. R. (2019). A cross-sectional description of open access publication costs, policies and impact in emergency medicine and critical care journals. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 9(3), 150-155.
Eisenegger, M., y Imhof, K. (2004). Reputationsrisiken moderner Organisationen. In U. Röttger (Ed.), Theorien der Public Relations: Grundlagen und Perspektiven der PR-Forschung (pp. 239-260). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Goldsmith, R. E., Flynn, L. R., y Kim, D. (2010). Status Consumption and Price Sensitivity. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 18(4), 323-338. DOI:
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Berkwits, M., Flanagin, A., Godlee, F., y Bloom, T. (2019). The Ninth International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication: A Call for Research. In JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, 322 (17), 1658-1660. American Medical Association.
King, D. W., y Alvarado-Albertorio, F. M. (2008). Pricing and other means of charging for scholarly journals: A literature review and commentary. Learned Publishing, 21 (4), 248-272.
Khoo, S. Y.-S. (2019). Article Processing Charge Hyperinflation and Price Insensitivity: An Open Access Sequel to the Serials Crisis. LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries, 29(1), 1-18.
Kumcu, E., y McClure, J. E. (2003). Explaining Prestige Pricing: An Alternative to Back-Bending Demand. Marketing Education Review, 13(1), 49-57.
Mack, C. (2015). 350 Years of Scientific Journals. Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS, 14(1), 010101.
Matthias, L., Jahn, N., y Laakso, M. (2019). The two-way street of open access journal publishing: Flip it and reverse it. Publications, 7(2).
Mcguigan, G. S., y Russell, R. D. (2008). The Business of Academic Publishing: A Strategic Analysis of the Academic Journal Publishing Industry and its Impact on the Future of Scholarly Publishing. Disponible en: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ejasljournal/105.
Morales, E., McKiernan, E. C., Niles, M. T., Schimanski, L., y Alperin, J. P. (2021). How faculty define quality, prestige, and impact of academic journals. PLOS ONE, 16(10), e0257340.
Oaxaca, R. (1973). Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets. International Economic Review, 14(3), 693-709.
Pallares, C., Vélez Cuartas, G., Uribe-Tirado, A., Restrepo, D., Ochoa, J., y Suárez, M. (2022). Situación del acceso abierto y los pagos por APC en Colombia. Un modelo de análisis aplicable a Latinoamérica. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 45(4), e342.
Pilato, V., y Tran, C. Y. (2020). Stony Brook University Author Perspectives on Article Processing Charges. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 8(1), eP2349.
Publons. (2018). Publons’ Global State of Peer Review 2018. Publons, 31-32.
Schönfelder, N. (2020). Article processing charges: Mirroring the citation impact or legacy of the subscription-based model? Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 6-27.
Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Maduekwe, O., Turner, L., Barbour, V., Burch, R., Clark, J., Galipeau, J., Roberts, J., y Shea, B. J. (2017). Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Medicine, 15(1), 28.
Segado-Boj, F., Prieto-Gutiérrez, J.-J., y Martín-Quevedo, J. (2022). Attitudes, willingness, and resources to cover article publishing charges: The influence of age, position, income level country, discipline and open access habits. Learned Publishing, 35(4), 489-498.
Sener, M., Davulcu, C. D., Tahta, M., y Gunal, I. (2019). Predatory journal preference in the field of Orthopaedics and Traumatology in Turkey. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 53(5), 390-393.
Shen, Y. (2018). Data sharing practices, information exchange behaviors, and knowledge discovery dynamics: a study of natural resources and environmental scientists. Environmental Systems Research, 6(1).
Solomon, D., y Björk, B. C. (2016). Article processing charges for open access publication-the situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada. PeerJ, 2016(7), e2264.
Solomon, D. J., y Björk, B. C. (2012). A study of open access journals using article processing charges. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1485-1495.
Springer. (2023, April 18). Article Processing Charges (APC). Disponible en: https://Support.Springer.Com/En/Support/Solutions/Articles/6000211135-Article-Processing-Charges-Apc-.
Springer Nature. (2022). The fundamentals of open access and open research. Disponble en: https://www.springernature.com/la/open-science/about/the-fundamentals-of-open-access-and-open-research.
Tenopir, Carol., y King, D. W. (2000). Towards electronic journals: Realities for scientists, librarians, and publishers. Psycoloquy, 11, 488. Special Libraries Association.
UCSB Library. (2020). Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory. Disponible en: https://www.library.ucsb.edu/research/db/338.
Varian, H. R. (2014). Intermediate microeconomics: a modern approach. Ninth edition. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, c2014. Disponible en: https://search.library.wisc.edu/catalog/9910206754602121.
Villarroya, A., Claudio-González, M., Abadal, E., y Melero, R. (2012). Modelos de negocio de las editoriales de revistas científicas: implicaciones para el acceso abierto. El Profesional de La Informacion, 21(2), 129-135.
Willinsky, J., y Rusk, M. (2019). If Research Libraries and Funders Finance Open Access: Moving Beyond Subscriptions and APCs. Willinsky: College y Research Libraries.
XiA, J. (2015). Predatory journals and their article publishing charges. Learned Publishing, 28(1), 69-74.
Yan, J. R., Baldawi, H., Lex, J. R., Simchovich, G., Baisi, L. P., Bozzo, A., y Ghert, M. (2018). Predatory publishing in orthopaedic research. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume, 100(21).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
