RDA, the new cataloging code: changes and challenges

Authors

  • Paola Picco Escuela Universitaria de Bibliotecología y Ciencias Afines, Universidad de la República
  • Virginia Ortiz Repiso Departamento de Biblioteconomía y Documentación, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2012.1.848

Keywords:

cataloging, FRBR, RDA, cataloging standards, linked data, cloud computing

Abstract


An in-depth study presenting the new cataloging code, RDA (Resource Description and Access) and its relationship to technology. Its origin, what it represents and its implications for cataloging are analyzed. The state of bibliographic control and the foundations of the new cataloging code are reviewed. Details are presented concerning its structure, changes and advantages of being based on the FRBR model. Reference is also made to RDA’s adoption by the international community. Finally, the article sets forth the changes and doubts that RDA prompts. The exhaustive bibliographic review permits the identification of the most significant changes as well as the pros and cons. Likewise, a detailed study of the Functional Requirements of Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and the Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD) enables a better understanding of the new code’s instructions, connections and relationships to them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aalberg, T.; Berg Haugen, F., y Husby, O. (2006). A tool for converting from MARC to FRBR. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4172, 453-456. Disponible en: http://www.springerlink.com/content/5356711834963732/fulltext.pdf [Consulta: 10/02/2011].

Agenjo Bullón, X., y Hernández Carrascal, F. (2010). La biblioteca virtual: función y planteamiento. Disponible en: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/14352 [Consulta: 17/07/2011].

Anglo American Cataloging Rules (2002-2005). Ottawa: Canadian Library Association.

Austlit (2011). Austilit data models. Disponible en: http://www.austlit.edu.au/about/metadata [Consulta: 10/02/2011].

Bianchini, C., y Guerrini, M. (2009). Quis custodiet ipsos custodies? Observaciones sobre la relación entre FRBR, ICP, ISBD y RDA. Anales de Documentación, 12, 321-341. Disponible en: http://revistas.um.es/analesdoc/article/view/70401/67871 [Consulta: 10/02/2011].

Carlyle, A. (2006). Understanding FRBR as a conceptual model: FRBR and the bibliographic universe. Library Resources & Technology Services, 50 (4), 264-273.

DCMI/RDA Task Group Workshop (2011). A session at the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications. Disponible en: http://lanyrd.com/2011/dc2011/sfxzw/ [Consulta: 18/7/2011]

Delsey, T. (1997). Modeling the logic of AACR. Paper presented at the International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, Toronto, Canada, October, 23-25. Disponible en: http://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/200/300/jsc_aacr/modeling/r-bibun.pdf [Consulta: 10/2/2011].

Delsey, T. (1998). The logical structure of the Anglo American Cataloging Rules pt 1. Disponible en: http://www.collectioncanada.ca/jsc/docs/aacr.pdf [Consulta: 10/02/2011].

Delsey, T. (1999). The logical structure of the Anglo American Cataloging Rules Pt2. Disponible en: http://www.collectionscanada.ca/jsc/docs/aacr2.pdf [Consulta: 10/02/ 2011].

Delsey, T. (2009). RDA database implementation scenarios. Disponible en: http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/5editor2rev.pdf [Consulta: 10/02/2011].

Dunsire, G. (2007a). Distinguising content from carrier: The RDA/ONIX framework for resource categorization. D-Lib Magazine, vol. 13 (1/2).

Dunsire, G. (2007b). RDA y sistemas bibliotecarios. BiD Textos universitaris de biblioteconomía i documentació, 19. Disponible en: http://www.ub.edu/bid/19dunsir.htm [Consulta: 10/02/2011].

Estivill Rius, A. (2009). Estado actual de la normativa de catalogación. primera parte: El escenario internacional. BiD Textos Universitaris De Biblioteconomia i Documentació, 22 Disponible en: http://www.ub.edu/bid/22/estivill2.htm [Consulta: 10/02/2011].

Estivill Rius, A. (2011). Nueva normativa de catalogación: pasos hacia un futuro prometedor pero incierto. Anuario ThinkEPI, 162-167.

Gorman, M. (2006). Cataloguing and the third way: An essay on bibliographical control in the digital age. Journal of Library & Information Science, vol. 32 (1), 5-10.

Heaney, M. (2000). An interview with Tom Delsey. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, vol. 28 (3), 3-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J104v28n03_02 PMid:20004670

Hernández, A. M. (2010). RDA in BNE. Disponible en: http://www.bne.es/opencms/es/Servicios/NormasEstandares/DocumentosProfesionales/Docs/RDAenBNE.pdf [Consulta: 10/02/ 2011].

Heath, T., y Bizer, C. (2011). Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space. London: Morgan & Laypool publishers, 137 p.

Hider, P. (2009). A comparison between RDA taxonomies and user categorizations of content and carrier. Cataloguing and Classification Quarterly, 47 (6), 544-560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639370902929755 PMid:20004670

Hillmann. D.; Coyle, K.; Phipps, J., y Dunsire, G. (2010). RDA vocabularies: process, outcome, use. D-Lib Magazine, 16 (2).

IFLA (2007). International standard bibliographic description (ISBD). München: K.G. Saur.

IFLA (2009a). Declaración de Principios Internacionales de Catalogación. Disponible en: http://www.ifla.org/files/cataloguing/icp/icp_2009-es.pdf [Consulta: 10/02/2011]. I FLA (2009b). Functional Requirements for Authority Data: A conceptual model. München: K. G. Saur.

IFLA (2010). Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data: A conceptual model. Disponible en: http://www.ifla.org/files/classification-and-indexing/functional-requirements-for-subject-authority-data/frsad-model.pdf [Consulta: 18/07/2011].

IFLA (1998). Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final report. München: K.G. Saur.

Joint Steering Committee for development of RDA. (1997). International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, Toronto, Canada, October 23-25. Disponible en: http://www.rda-jsc.org/intlconf1.html [Consulta: 10/02/2011].

Kent State University. School of Library and Information Science (2011). FRBR based systems to effectively support user tasks and facilitate information seeking. Disponible en: http://frbr.slis.kent.edu [Consulta: 10/02/2011].

Le Boeuf, P. (2002). FRBR and further. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 32 (4), 15-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J104v32n04_03 PMid:20004670

Library of Congress (2011). Bibliographic framework transition initiative. Disponible en: http://www.loc.gov/marc/transition/ [Consulta: 18/7/2011].

Library of Congress. (2009a). Formato MARC21 conciso para datos bibliográficos. Disponible en: http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/ecbdspa.html [Consulta: 10/02/2011].

Library of Congress (2009b). FRBR display tool. Disponible en: http://www.loc.gov/marc/marc-functional-analysis/tool.html [Consulta: 10/02/2011].

Library of Congress (2009c). Propose methodology for US. national libraries RDA test. Disponible en: http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/rda/testing.html [Consulta: 10/02/2011].

Madison, O. M. A. (2005). The origins of the IFLA study on Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. Cataloguing and Classification Quarterly, 39 (4/5), 15-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J104v39n03_02 PMid:20004670

National Library of Australia (2010). Resource description and access (RDA) in Australia. Disponible en: http://www.nla.gov.au/lis/stndrds/grps/acoc/rda.html [Consulta: 15/02/2011].

OCLC (2009a). FictionFinder: A FRBR based prototype for fiction in WorldCat. Disponible en: http://www.oclc.org/research/activities/fictionfinder/default.htm [Consulta: 10/02/2011].

OCLC (2009b). Online catalogs: What user and librarians want. Disponible en: http://www.oclc.org/reports/onlinecatalogs/default.htm [Consulta: 10/02/ 2011].

OCLC. (2010). OCLC policy statement on RDA cataloging in WorldCat for the US testing period. Disponible en: http://www.oclc.org/us/en/rda/policy.htm [Consulta: 10/02/2011].

Oliver, C. (2010). Introducing RDA: A guide to the basics. Chicago: American Library Association.

Open Metadata Registry (2011). The RDA vocabularies. Disponible en: http://metadataregistry.org/rdabrowse.htm [Consulta: 18/07/2011].

Ortiz- Repiso, V. (2005). La catalogación en un entorno híbrido: átomos y bits. En: Orera Orera, L. (Ed.), La biblioteca universitaria (pp. 259-286). Madrid: Sintesis.

Ortiz- Repiso, V.; Moscoso, P. (1999). Web based OPACs: Between tradition and innovation. Information Technology and Libraries, vol. 18 (2), 68-77.

Peset, F.; Ferrer-Sapema, A., y Subirats-Coll, I. (2011). Open data y linked data: su impacto en el área de bibliotecas y documentación. El Profesional de la información, vol. 20 (2), 165-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2011.mar.06

Picco, G., P. A. (2007). RDA: El alcance internacional del nuevo código de catalogación. Transinformação, 19 (3), 219-226.

RDA in Europe: Making it happen. summary of presentations by european countries on plans moving to RDA. (2010). Disponible en: http://www.slainte.org.uk/eurig/docs/RDA2010/OtherEURIG2010.pdf [Consulta: 15/02/ 2011].

RDA toolkit. (2010). Disponible en: http://www.rdatoolkit.org/ [Consulta: 10/02/2011].

RDA, resource description and access (2010). American Library Association, Canadian Library Association, CILIP.

Salamanca Chiverto, D. (2008). La categorización de contenidos y medios en la descripción bibliográfica: la designación general de material (DGM) y su pasado, presente y futuro en la era digital. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, vol. 31 (4), 527-551.

Svenonius, E. (2000). The intellectual foundation of information organization. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Taylor, A. (2007). An introduction to Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). En: Taylor, A. (ed.), Understanding FRBR: What is and how it will affect our retrieval tools . Westport, CT.: Libraries Unlimited.

U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee (2011). Report and Recommendations. Disponible en http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/rda/rdatesting-finalreport-20june2011.pdf [Consulta: 18/07/2011].

Vellucci, S. (1997). Bibliographic relationships. Paper presented at the International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, Toronto, Canada, October 23-25. Disponible en http://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/200/300/jsc_aacr/bib_rel/r-bibrel.pdf [Consulta: 10/02/2011].

VTLS (2008). What is virtua? Disponible en http://www.vtls.com/products/virtua [Consulta: 10/02/2011].

W3C Library Linked Data Incubator Group (2010). Incubator Activity. Disponible en: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/ [Consulta: 18/07/2011].

W3C Library Linked Data Incubator Group (2005). Library Standards. Disponible en: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/images/1/12/LayeredModelV3.pdf [Consulta: 18/07/2011].

Zhang, Y., y Salaba, A. (2009). Implementing FRBR in libraries: Key issues and future directions. New York: Neal Schuman.

Downloads

Published

2012-03-30

How to Cite

Picco, P., & Ortiz Repiso, V. (2012). RDA, the new cataloging code: changes and challenges. Revista Española De Documentación Científica, 35(1), 145–173. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2012.1.848

Issue

Section

Studies