Classification of academic research in Metaliteracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2020.4.1728Keywords:
Metaliteracy, information literacy, multiliteracies, taxonomies, competence categories, education, research, classificationAbstract
Among the multiliteracies landscape, Metaliteracy presents a transversal and integrative conceptual model. Its innovative approach invites to identify published work and categorize them to understand their methods of study. Research regarding Metaliteracy was identified by a review of the literature, categorizing the results by authorship, date, institutional affiliation of authors and main sources of publication. Regarding the subject analysis, an ad hoc classification was applied to organize keywords and match them to thematic categories of the Taxonomic Model of the research project VOREMETUR. The results of this project aim to design Metaliteracy programs for digital information. Metaliteracy academic research is still scarce and recent. The degree of authorship and dispersion is high. The conceptual development of Metaliteracy is linked to the theoretical foundation of case studies, without a global approach to applied research. The validity of the VOREMETUR Taxonomic Model is verified.
Downloads
References
Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) (2016). Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Disponible en: http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework [Fecha de consulta: 27/10/2019]
Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) (2016). ACRL Framework for Information Literacy Sandbox. Disponible en: https://sandbox.acrl.org/ [Fecha de consulta: 27/10/2019]
Attu, R.; Terras, M. (2017). What people study when they study Tumblr: Classifying Tumblr-related Academic Research. Journal of Documentation, 73 (3), 528-554. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-08-2016-0101
Borges, J. (2018). Competências Infocomunicacionais: estrutura conceitual e indicadores de avaliação. Informação & Sociedade, 28 (1),123-140. https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.1809-4783.2018v28n1.38289
Borges, J.; Brandão, G. (2016). Análise das competências infocomunicacionais a partir da metaliteracy: um estudo com arquivistas. Ciência da Informação, 45 (2), 15-25.
Carlito, M. D. (2018). Supporting multimodal literacy in library instruction. Reference Services Review, 46 (2). https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-02-2018-0015
Caulfield, M. (2017). Web Literacy for Student Fact-checkers. Disponible en: https://webliteracy. pressbooks.com/ [Fecha de consulta: 27/10/2019]
Cooke, N.A. (2018). Fake News and Alternative Facts: Information Literacy in a Post-Truth Era. Washington: ALA.
Deja, M.; Rak, D. (2019). Knowledge management and academic information behavior. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 71 (4), 480-499. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-09-2018-0219
Delello, J.; McWhorter, R. (2017). Reducing the digital divide: Connecting older adults to iPad technology. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 36 (1), 3-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464815589985 PMid:26084479
Desilets, M. R.; Larson, C. M.; Filkins, M. M.; DeJonghe, J. (2017). Forging Connections in Digital Spaces: Teaching Information Literacy Skills Through Engaging Online Activities. En: Distributed Learning. Pedagogy and Technology in Online Information Literacy Instruction, pp. 205-219. Oxford: Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100598-9.00011-8
Dunaway, M. K. (2011). Connectivism. Learning theory and pedagogical practice for networked information landscapes. Reference Services Review, 39 (4), 675- 685. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907321111186686
Fulkerson, D. M.; Ariew, S. A.; Jacobson, T. E. (2017). Revisiting metacognition and metaliteracy in the ACRL framework. Communications in Information Literacy, 11 (1), 21-41. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2017.11.1.45
Gilmore, P.; Smith, D. M. (2005). Seizing academic power: Indigenous subaltern voices, metaliteracy, and counternarratives in higher education. En: Language, literacy, and power in schooling, 67-88.
IFLA (2017). How to spot fake news. Disponible en: https://www.ifla.org/publications/node/11174 [Fecha de consulta: 06/12/2019].
Jacobson, T. E.; Mackey, T. P. (2011). Reframing information literacy as a metaliteracy. College & Research Libraries, 72 (1): 62-78. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-76r1
Jacobson, T. E.; Mackey, T. P. (2013). Proposing a metaliteracy model to redefine information literacy. Communications in information literacy, 7 (2), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2013.7.2.138
Jacso, P. (2005). As we may search - comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Current Science, 89, (9), 1537-1547.
Jenkins, H.; Clinton, K.; Purushotma, R.; Robinson, A. J.; Weigel, M. (2009). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture. Media Education for the 21st Century. Cambridge (Mas.)-London: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8435.001.0001
Karvalics, L. Z. (2014). Emerging New Information Literacies - A Conceptual Outlook (2014). En: Kurbanoğlu, S. y otros (eds.), Information Literacy. Lifelong Learning and Digital Citizenship in the 21st Century. ECIL 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 492. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14136-7_5
Levine-Clark, M.; Gil, E. (2009). A comparative analysis of social sciences citation tools. Online Information Review, 33 (5), 986-996. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520911001954
Ma, J.; Li, C.; Liang, H. (2019). Enhancing Students' Blended Learning Experience through Embedding Metaliteracy. Education Research International, V2019, Article ID 6791058. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6791058
Mackey, T.; Jacobsen, T. E. (2014). Metaliteracy. Reinventing information literacy to empowers learners. Washington: ALA Neal-Schuman.
Mackey, T.; Jacobson, T.E. (2011). Reframing information literacy as a metaliteracy. College & research libraries, 72 (1), 62-78. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-76r1
Mackey, T. P.; Jacobson, T. E. (2019). Metaliterate Learning for the Post-Truth World. Washington: ALA Neal-Schuman.
Martínez-Cardama, S.; Algora-Cancho, L. (2019). Lucha contra la desinformación desde las bibliotecas universitarias. El Profesional de la Información, 28 (4), e280412. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.jul.12
Marzal, M. A.; Borges, J. (2017). Modelos evaluativos de Metaliteracy y alfabetización en información como factores de excelencia académica. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 40 (3), e184. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2017.3.1410
Mortimore, J. M.; Baker, R. L. (2019). Supporting student-led content creation in the distance learning environment with libguides CMS. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 13, (1-2), 88-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2018.1499239
O'Brien, K.; Forte, M.; Mackey, T.; Jacobson, T. (2017). Metaliteracy as pedagogical framework for learner-centered design in three MOOC platforms: Connectivist, coursera and canvas. Open Praxis, 9 (3), 267-286. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.3.553
Prensky, M. (2008). Programming is the new literacy. Edutopia magazine. Disponible en: https:// www.edutopia.org/literacy-computer-programming [Fecha de consulta: 27/10/2019].
Raish, V.; Rimland, E. (2016). Employer perceptions of critical information literacy skills and digital badges. College & Research Libraries, 77 (1), 87- 113. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.77.1.87
Rath, L.; Cimbricz, S. (2015). Collaborating Around Critical Multiliteracies: A Formula for Success. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 34 (2), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639269.2015.1042816
Reeder, K.; Shapiro, J. (1993). Relationships between early literate experience and knowledge and children's linguistic pragmatic strategies. Journal of Pragmatics, 19 (1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90067-Y
Schirato, T; Webb, J. (2003). Bourdieu's concept of reflexivity as metaliteracy. Cultural studies, 17 (3-4), 539-553. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950238032000083935
Scolari, C. A.; Masanet, M.J.; Guerrero-Pico, M.; Establés, M.J. (2018). Transmedia literacy in the new media ecology: Teens' transmedia skills and informal learning strategies. El profesional de la información (EPI), 27 (4), 801-812. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.jul.09
Scott, R. (2016). Accommodating Faculty Requests and Staying True to Your Pedagogical Ideals in the 1-Shot Information Literacy Session. Communications in Information Literacy, 10, (2), 133-142. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2016.10.2.29
Secker, J.; Coonan, E. (2011). A New Curriculum for Information Literacy (ANCIL): curriculum and supporting documents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Library. Disponible en: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/17370/1/ANCIL_final.pdf [Fecha de consulta: 27/10/2019].
Siemens, G. (2010). Conociendo el conocimiento. Traducido por grupo Nodos Ele: Quintana, E.; Vidal, D.; Torres, L.; Castrillejo, V.; Santamaria, F.; Alonso, N. Disponible en: http://yoprofesor.org/2015/12/06/conociendo-el-conocimiento-george-siemens-descarga-gratuita/ [Fecha de consulta: 27/10/2019].
Špiranec, S.; Banek-Zorica, M. (2010). Information Literacy 2.0: hype or discourse refinement?. Journal of documentation, 66 (1), 140-153. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411011016407
Stordy, P. (2015). Taxonomy of literacies. Journal of Documentation, 71 (3), 456-476. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2013-0128
Stanford History Education Group. (2016). Evaluating information: The cornerstone of civic online reasoning. Palo Alto: Stanford University. Disponible en: https://www.csai-online.org/resources/evaluating-information-cornerstone-civic-online-reasoning [Fecha de consulta: 27/10/2019].
Thomas, S.; Chris, J.; Laccetti, J.; Mason, B.; Mills, S.; Perril, S.; Pullinger, K. (2007). Transliteracy: crossing divides. First Monday, 12 (12). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v12i12.2060
Tuominen, K. (2007). Information literacy 2.0. Signum, 5, 6-12.
Wallis, L. (2014). #selfiesinthestacks: Sharing the Library with Instagram. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 19 (3-4), 181-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2014.983287
Williams, S .A.; Terras, M. M.; Warwick, C. (2013). What do people study when they study Twitter? Classifying Twitter related academic papers. Journal of Documentation, 69 (3) 384-410. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2012-0027
Yeager, C.; Hurley-Dasgupta, B.; Bliss, C. A. (2013). cMOOCs and global learning: An authentic alternative. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17 (2), 133-147. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v17i2.347
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
Funding data
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
Grant numbers HAR2016-75949-C2-1-R
