Industrial innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2007.v30.i4.405Keywords:
innovation processes, innovation indicators, innovation modelsAbstract
A study about the state of the art of definitions, theories and patterns of innovation processes is presented. The process of development of industrial innovation as well as the more commonly used indicators are analysed. The harmonized surveys used in industrialized countries to obtain innovation statistics and indicators are presented.
Downloads
References
1. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press. Cambridge. Mass.
2. Rosenberg, N.; Landau, R.; Mowery, D. (1992). Technology and the Wealth of Nations. Introduction. Rosenberg, Landau and Mowery (eds). Stanford University Press. Stanford CA.
3. OCDE. (1991) Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. Oslo Manual. OCDE. París, 1991.
4. OCDE. (2005). Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. Oslo Manual. (3º edition). OECD. París, 2005.
5. Miler, I (2005). Innovation in Services. Chapter 16, in J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery and RR Nelson (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
6. Lam, A., (2005) Organizational Innovation. Chapter 5 in J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery and RR Nelson (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
7. Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge (Mass). Harvard University Press.
8. Kline, S.J.; Rosenberg, N.(1986). An overview of innovation. En: Landan, R.; Rosenberg, N. (Editors). The Positive Sum Strategy. Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. Washington. D.C. National Academic Press, p. 275-306, 1986.
9. Gobeli, D. H.; Brown, D. J. (1993). Improving the process of product innovation. Research Technology Management, v. 36, nº 2, pp. 38-44.
10. Freeman, C. (1994). The economics of technical change. Cambridge Journal of Economics. v.18, nº 5, pp.463-514.
11. Moen, J. (2005). Is mobility of technical personnel a source of R&D spillovers?. Journal of Labour Economics. 23 (1) p. 81-114. doi:10.1086/425434
12. Laursen, K., Foss, N. (2000) New HRM practices, complementarities and the inpact of innovation performance. IVS Working Paper, nº 5. Copenhagen Business School.
13. FUNDACIÓN COTEC PARA LA INNOVACIÓN TECNOLÓGICA.(2006). Tecnología e innovación en España. Informe COTEC, ISBN: 84-95336-66-9. 2006.
14. European Commission. (1996). International Conference. Innovation Measurement and Policies. Luxembourg, 20-21 May, 1996.
15. OECD (1990). Description of Innovation Surveys and Surveys of Technology use carried out in OECD member countries. OECD. París.
16. Comisión Europea. (1996). Encuesta Comunitaria sobre Innovación. 1992. Bruselas.
17. INE.
18. INE (Instituto Nacional de Estadística).(1991). Encuesta sobre Innovación Tecnológica en las Empresas. Estudio piloto.
20. Archibugi, D. (1992). Patenting as an indicator of technological innovation. A review. Science and Public Policy. v. 19, nº 5, p. 1-13
21. Pavitt, K. (1982). R&D patenting and innovative activities. A statistical exploration. Research Policy, v. 11, nº 1, p. 33-51, 1982. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90005-1
22. OECD (2005). Science and Technology and Industry Scoreboard. Towards a Knowledge based Economy.2005.
23. OCDE (2006) Main Science and Technology Indicators, vol 2006/2
24. Coombs, R; Narandren, P.; Richards, A. (1991). A literature-based innovation output indicators. Research Policy, nº 25, p. 403-413.
25. Santarelli. E; Piergiovanni, R. (1996). Analyzing literature-based innovation output indicators. The Italian experience. Research Policy, nº 25, p. 689-711.
26. Frenkel, A., Maital, S., Grupp, H. (2000). Measuring dynamic technological change: a technometrics approach. International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 20, nº 3/4, p. 429-441. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2000.002864
27. Etzkowitz, H. Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dinamics of innovation: from National Systems and mode 2 to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, vol.29, p. 109-123. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
28. Leydesdorff, L, Meyer, M. (2006) Triple helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems. Introduction to the special issue. Research Policy, vol. 35, p. 1441- 1449. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.016
29. Lundvall, B. A. (2002). Innovation Growth and Social Cohesion. The Danish model. Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc. ISBN 183064 743 4. p. 219.
30. Archibugui, D.; Michie, J. (1995). The globalization of Technology: a new taxonomy. Cambridge Journal of Economy, 19 (1), p. 121-140.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2007 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
