Ranking of Spanish university libraries according to their personnel management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2016.1.1259Keywords:
Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), university libraries, efficiency, super-efficiency, cross-efficiency, library personnel, personnel efficiency, library rankingAbstract
The aim of this work is twofold: first, to identify those Spanish public university libraries that have been the best at efficiently managing their personnel between 2008 and 2012, and can therefore be considered a reference in the area of efficiency improvement. Secondly, to look at the differences in the way personnel is organized between the most and the least efficient libraries. Efficiency was calculated using a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). In addition, the method used to rank the most efficient libraries consisted of counting the number of reference units, calculating the super-efficiency scores, and applying a cross-evaluation method. On the whole, the libraries analysed show a high global and pure technical efficiency. Of the most efficient libraries, there are two that are at the top of the ranking in each of the years studied. Personnel organization in these two libraries is different from that of the two least efficient centres in the study.
Downloads
References
Adler, N; Friedman, L; Sinuany-Stern, Z. (2002). Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 140, 249–265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00068-1
Andersen, P; Petersen, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, vol. 39, 1261–1264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261
Angulo-Meza, L; Lins, M.P.E. (2002). Review of methods for increasing discrimination in data envelopment analysis, Annals of Operations Research, vol. 116, 225– 242.
Banker, R. D; Charnes, A; Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, vol. 30(9), 1078–1092. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
Banker, R. D; Chang, H. (2006). The super-efficiency procedure for outlier identification, not for ranking efficient units. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 175, 1311–1320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.06.028
Bellini, T. (2012). Forward search outlier detection in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 216, 200-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.07.023
Bergendahl, G. (1998). DEA and benchmarks -an application to Nordic banks. Annals of Operations Research, vol. 82, 233-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018910719517
Carvalho, F.A; Jorge, M. J; Jorge, M. F; Russo, M; Sá, N. O. (2012). Library performance management in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil: applying DEA to a sample of university libraries in 2006-2007. Library Management, Vol. 33(4/5), 297-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01435121211242335
Carvalho, F.A; Jorge, M. J; Jorge, M. F.; Medeiros, R.O. (2013). Análise de eficiência e desempenho no longo prazo: ilustração empírica de um modelo para avaliação de bibliotecas públicas. Investigación Bibliotecológica, vol. 27 (60), 71-95.
Charnes, A; Cooper, W. W; Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 2(6), 429–444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
Chen, T. (1997). A measurement of the resource utilization efficiency of university libraries. International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 53(1), 71-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(97)00102-3
Doyle, J. R; Green, R.H. (1994). Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and uses, Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 45, 567–578.
Hwang, M. J; Shieh, J. C; Hsieh, C. C. (2012). Using data envelopment analysis to evaluate library electronic databases. Journal of Educational Media and Library Science, vol. 49 (3), 343-368.
Jarrillo Calvarro, S. (2012). Bibliotecas universitarias y costes. ¿Valemos lo que costamos? Boletín de la Asociación Andaluza de Bibliotecarios. vol. 103, 45-57.
Johnson, A. L; McGinnis, L. F. (2008). Outlier detection in two-stage semiparametric DEA models. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 187, 629– 635. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.03.041
Kao, C; Lin, Y-C. (1999). Comparing University Libraries of Different University Size. Libri, vol. 49, 150–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/libr.1999.49.3.150
Kao, C; Liu, S-T. (2000). Data envelopment analysis with missing data: an application to University libraries in Taiwan. Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 51, 897-905. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600056
Kao. C; Lin Y-C. (2004). Evaluation of the university libraries in Taiwan: total measure versus ratio measure. Journal Operational Research Society, vol. 55 (12), 1256-1265.
Lai, M. C; Wang, W. K; Huang, H. C; Meng- Kao, M. C. (2011). Linking the benchmarking tool to a knowledge-based system for performance improvement. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, 10579–10586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.101
Lee, C. W; Kwak, N.K.; Garrett, W. A. (2013). A Comparative Appraisal of Operational Efficiency in U.S. Research-University Libraries: A DEA Approach. En: Lawrence, K. D; Kleinman, G (editores) Applications of Management Science, vol. 16, pp. 117-130, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Liu, S. T; Chuang, M. (2009). Fuzzy efficiency measures in fuzzy DEA/AR with application to university libraries. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, 1105-1113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.013
Lu, W. M; Lo, S. F. (2009). An interactive benchmark model ranking performers- Application to financial holding companies. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 49, 172-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2008.06.008
Mann, G. M. (1997). Efficiency evaluations of North American university libraries: Data envelopment analysis. Doctoral Thesis. Montreal, Canada: McGill University. http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/ obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp01/MQ29750.pdf. [consulta: 4 de junio de 2014].
Noh, Y. (2011). Evaluation of the resource utilization efficiency of university libraries using DEA techniques and a proposal of alternative evaluation variables. Library Hi Technology, vol. 29 (4), 697-724. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378831111189787
Owadie, S. (2011). Measuring the efficiency of university libraries, Ghana-Using data envelopment analysis. Tesis Doctoral. University of Science and Technology-Ghana.
REBIUN. Red de Bibliotecas Universitarias. Estadística REBIUN. https://rebiun.um.es/rebiun/admin/Man ageIndicatorsPage;jsessionid=0BF061E983FD837 61AF6AB7856849971 [consultada desde el 10 de julio hasta el 20 diciembre de 2014].
Reichmann, G. (2004). Measuring university library efficiency using data envelopment analysis. Libri, vol. 54 (2), 136-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/libr.2004.136
Reichmann, G; Sommersguter-Reichmann, M. (2006). University library benchmarking: An international comparison using DEA. International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 100, (1), 131-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.10.007
Reichmann, G; Sommersguter-Reichmann, M. (2010). Efficiency measures and productivity indexes in the context of university library benchmarking. Applied Economics, vol. 42 (3), 311-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036840701604511
Saunders, E. S. (2003). Cost efficiency in ARL academic libraries. The Bottom Line, vol. 16(1), 5-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/08880450310464009
Sexton, T.R; Silkman, R. H; Hogan, A. J. (1986). Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions. In: Silkman, R.H. (ed.), Measuring efficiency: an assessment of data envelopment analysis. New Directions for Program Evaluation, vol. 1986 (32), 73-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ev.1441
Shahwan, T. M; Kaba, A. (2013). Efficiency analysis of GCC academic libraries: an application of data envelopment analysis. Performance Measurement and Metrics, vol. 14(3), 197-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/PMM-07-2013-0023
Shim, W. (2000). Assessing technical efficiency of research libraries. Advances in Library Administration and Organization, vol. 17, 243–339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0732-0671(00)80011-5
Shim W. (2003). Applying DEA technique to library evaluation in academic research libraries. Library Trends, vol 51(3), 312-32.
Simar, L. (2003). Detecting Outliers in Frontiers Models: A Simple Approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, vol. 20, 391–424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1027308001925
Simon Blas, C; Arias Coello, A; Simon Martin J. (2007). Aplicación de la técnica DEA en la medición de la eficiencia de las bibliotecas de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Revista Espa-ola de Documentación Científica, vol. 30 (1), 9-23.
Simon, J; Simon, C; Arias, A. (2011). Changes in productivity of Spanish university libraries. Omega, vol. 39 (5), 578-588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2010.12.003
Stancheva, N; Angelova, W. (2008). Measuring the efficiency of university libraries using data envelopment analysis. En Research methodology in data envelopment analysis. Ed. J. Kumar Mantri. pgs. 13-21. Universal Publisher. USA 2008.
Talluri, F; Sarkis, J. (1997). Extensions in efficiency measurement of alternate machine component grouping solutions via Data Envelopment Analysis. IEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 44(3), 299-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/17.618171
Torgersen, A. M; Førsund, F. R; Kittelsen, S.A.C. (1996). Slack-adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient units. Journal of Productivity Analysis, vol. 7, 379–398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00162048
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
