Explorando los Determinantes de la Producción de Investigación: Tipología de los Docentes Investigadores en una Universidad en Ecuador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2022.3.1884Palabras clave:
Producción de investigación, universidades, análisis de cluster, características individuales, factores institucionalesResumen
El propósito de esta investigación es describir el perfil investigador de los profesores universitarios en Ecuador, en función de los niveles de producción de investigación, de factores individuales (nivel de calificación académica y período de permanencia en la institución) y factores institucionales (tiempo invertido en investigación). Se aplicó el análisis de clusters a una muestra de diferentes niveles de producción científica: (1) profesores, (2) estrellas, (3) alto potencial, (4) bajo potencial y, (5) infrautilizado. Los hallazgos indican que el número de horas asignadas por la universidad para actividades de investigación, per se, no constituye un determinante de la producción de investigación de los docentes. Los resultados de la investigación sugieren que las autoridades universitarias en Ecuador deben establecer estrategias específicas, basadas en estos cinco perfiles, para incrementar la producción de investigación individual. El estudio ofrece pautas específicas para mejorar las decisiones sobre la asignación de recursos para mejorar la producción de investigación individual en las universidades.
Descargas
Citas
Ab Aziz, K., Harris, H., Richardson, S., and Ab Aziz, N.A. (2012). Drivers for university research performance: Investigating the researchers' dynamics. IBIMA Business Review, 2012, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5171/2012.418252
Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., and Di Costa, F. (2019). The collaboration behavior of top scientists. Scientometrics, 118(1), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2970-9
Aguinis, H., Ji, Y.H., and Joo, H. (2018). Gender productivity gap among star performers in STEM and other scientific fields. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(12), 1283. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000331 PMid:30024197
Allinson, P., and Stewart, J. (1974). Productivity differences among scientists: evidence for accumulative advantage. American Sociological Review, 39(4), 596-606. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094424
Álvarez-Muñoz, P., and Pérez-Montoro Gutiérrez, M. (2015). Análisis de la producción y de la visibilidad científica de Ecuador en el contexto andino. El Profesional de la Información, 24(5), 577-586. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.sep.07
Ballesteros-Rodríguez, J.L., De Saá-Pérez, P., García-Carbonell, N., Martín-Alcázar, F., and Sánchez-Gardey, G. (2020). Exploring the determinants of scientific productivity: a proposed typology of researchers. Journal of Intellectual Capital. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-07-2019-0178
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Betsey, Ch. (2007). Faculty Research Productivity: Institucional and Personal Determinants of Faculty Publications. The review of Black Political Economy, 34(1), 53-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12114-007-9004-9
Bland, C. J., Center, B. A., Finstad. D. A., Risebey. K. R., and Justin. G. J. (2005). A Theoretical. Practical. Predictive Model of Faculty and Department Research Productivity. Academic Medicine, 80(3), 225-237. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200503000-00006 PMid:15734804
Browning, L.; Thompson, K.; and Dawson, D. (2017). From early career researcher to research leader: survival of the fittest? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(4), 361-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2017.1330814
Callaghan, C.W. (2015). Higher education research productivity: The influences of different forms of human capital. South African Journal of Higher Education, 29(5), 85-105. Available at: https://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/sajhe/article/view/522
Cameron, D.H.L., Aleman-Meza, B., Decker, S., and Arpinar, I.B. (2007). SEMEF: A taxonomy-based discovery of experts, expertise and collaboration networks. Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia. Available at: http://webster.cs.uga.edu/~budak/thesis/delroy_thesis.doc
Carayol, N., and Matt, M. (2006). Individual and Collective Determinants of Academic Scientists' Productivity. Information Economics and Policy, 18(1), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2005.09.002
Castillo, J.A., and Powell, M. A. (2019). Análisis de la producción científica del Ecuador e impacto de la colaboración internacional en el periodo 2006-2015. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 42(1), 225. Available at: http://redc.revistas.csic.es/index.php/redc/article/view/1031/1660 https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2019.1.1567
Castillo, J.A., and Powell, M.A. (2020). Research productivity and international collaboration: a study of Ecuadorian Science. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 19(4), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192718792151
Cheng, J., Henisz W., Roth, K., and Swaminathan, A. (2009). Advancing interdisciplinary research in the field of international business: prospects, issues and challenges. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 1070-1074. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.41
Ebadi, A., and Schiffauerova, A. (2016). How to boost scientific production? A statistical analysis of research funding and other influencing factors. Scientometrics, 106(3), 1093-1116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1825-x
Enders, J. (2005). Border crossings: Research training, knowledge dissemination and the transformation of academic work. Higher Education, 49(1-2), 119-133. Available at: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10734-004-2917-3.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-2917-3
Escobar-Pérez, B., García-Meca, E., and Larrán-Jorge, M. (2014). Factores que influyen sobre la producción científica en Contabilidad en España: la opinión de los profesores universitarios de Contabilidad (II parte). Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 37(2), e047. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2014.2.1087
Falaster, C., Ferreira, M. P., and Serra, F.R. (2016). The research productivity of new Brazilian PhDs in management. Management Research, 14(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-11-2015-0619
Faver, C., and Fox, M. F. (1986). Research publication productivity and applied social science. Sociological Spectrum, 6(1), 379-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.1986.9981798
Fox, M. F. (1983). Publication productivity among scientist: a critical review. Social Studies of Science, 13, 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631283013002005
Fox, M. F. (1992). Research, teaching, and publication productivity: mutuality vs. competition in academia. Sociology of Education, 65(4), 293-305. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112772
Gao, Y., and Liu, J. (2020). Capitalising on academics' transnational experiences in the domestic research environment. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 1-15.
García, M. C. (2009). El estudio de productividad académica de profesores universitarios a través de análisis factorial confirmatorio: el caso de psicología en Estados Unidos de América. Universitas Psychologica, 9(1), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy9-1.epap
Gaus, N., Malago, J.D., Basri, M., Mustaking, M., Paramma, M.A., Maharani, N., and Angraeni, R. (2020). Why are academics of science more productive than those of social science? Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-01-2020-0007
Ghabban, F., Selamat, A., Ibrahim, R., Krejcar, O., Maresova, P., and Herrera-Viedma, E. (2019). The influence of personal and organizational factors on researchers' attitudes towards sustainable research productivity in Saudi universities. Sustainability, 11(17), 4804. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174804
Goldfarb, B. (2008). The effect of government contracting on academic research: Does the source of funding affect scientific output? Research Policy, 37(1), 41-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.011
Gruber, M,Heinemann, F., Brettel, M., and Hungeling, S. (2010). Configurations of resources and capabilities and their performance implications: An exploratory study on technology ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 31(12), 1337-1356. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.865
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., and Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hassan, A., Tymmsb, P., and Ismaila, H. (2008). Academic productivity as perceived by Malaysian academics. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 30(3), 283-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800802155184
Healey, R. L., and Davies, C. (2019). Conceptions of 'research' and their gendered impact on research activity: a UK case study. Higher Education Research and Development, 38(7), 1386-1400. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1657804
Hedjazi, Y., and Behravan, J. (2011). Study of factors influencing research productivity of agriculture faculty members in Irán. Higher Education, 62(5), 635-647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9410-6
Heng, K., Hamid, M.O., and Khan, A. (2020). Factors influencing academics' research engagement and productivity: A developing countries perspective. Issues in Educational Research, 30(3), 965-987.
Jacelon, C.S., Zucker, D.M., Staccarini, J M., and Henneman, E.A. (2003). Peer mentoring for tenure-track faculty. Journal of Professional Nursing, 19(6), 335-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-7223(03)00131-5
Johnson, M.A. (2017). Contemporary higher education reform in Ecuador: implications for faculty recruitment, hiring, and retention. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(68). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2794
Jung, J. (2012). faculty research productivity in Hong Kong across academic discipline. Higher Education Studies, 2(4), 1-14. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1081295 https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v2n4p1
Ketchen, D.J., and Shook, C.L. (1996). The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: an analysis and critique. Strategic Management Journal, 17(6), 441-458. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199606)17:6<441::AID-SMJ819>3.0.CO;2-G
Laabs, T.R. (1987). Community college tenure: Teach or research?. Community/Junior College Quarterly, 11(4), 267-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361697870110405
Larivière, V., and Costas, R. How Many Is Too Many? On the Relationship between Research Productivity and Impact. Plos One 11(9), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162709 PMid:27682366 PMCid:PMC5040433
Lerchenmueller, M.J., and Sorenson, O. (2018). The gender gap in early career transitions in the life sciences. Research Policy, 47(6), 1007-1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.009
Higher Education Act (2010). Registro Oficial Suplemento, 298, de 12 de octubre de 2010 [Official register] . Available at: https://www.derechoecuador.com/ley-organica-de-educacion-superior-loes
Lotka, A. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317-323. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24529203
Málaga-Sabogal, L., and Sagasti, F. (2021). Género, coautorías, e impacto: las publicaciones de investigadores peruanos en biología (1994-2017). Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 44(1), e283. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2021.1.1707
Mayer, S.J., and Rathmann, J. M. (2018). How does research productivity relate to gender? Analyzing gender differences for multiple publication dimensions. Scientometrics, 117(3), 1663-1693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2933-1
Moder, K. 2010. Alternatives to F-Test in One Way ANOVA in case of heterogeneity of variances (a simulation study). Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52(4): 343-353. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9c55/621b1b2ccc34046cbbb12645a018d416834e.pdf
Morrisey, M.A., and Cawley, J. (2008). The production of published research by US academic health economists. International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics, 8(3), 87-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-008-9033-3 PMid:18357517
Pinheiro, M. (2017). The performance of scientific research in management in Portugal: Some causes and consequences. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(103), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2895
Pires, A. D.S., Reategui, E.B., França, A.C.X., Bettinger, E., and Franco, S. R. K. (2020). The implications of the qualis journal classification in publication practices in Brazil between 2007 and 2016. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28(25), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.4353
Prpić, K. (1996). Characteristics and determinants of eminent scientists' productivity. Scientometrics, 36(2), 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017313
Ramsed, P. (1994). Describing and Explaining Research Productivity. Higher Education, 8(2), 207-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383729
Rodgers, J.R., and Neri, F. (2007). Research productivity of australian academic economists: human-capital and fixed effects. Australian Economic Papers, 67-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8454.2007.00306.x
Rodríguez Jiménez, C., Sanz Prieto, M., and Alonso García, S. (2019). Technology and higher education: A bibliometric analysis. Education Sciences, 9(3), 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030169
Rueda-Barrios, G., and Rodenes-Adam, M. (2016). Factores determinantes en la producción científica de los grupos de investigación en Colombia. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 39(1): e118. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2016.1.1198
Salinas-Ávila, J., Abreu- Ledón, R., and Tamayo-Arias, J. (2020). Intellectual capital and knowledge generation: an empirical study from Colombian public universities. Journal of Intellectual Capital. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-09-2019-0223
Scimago Journal and Country Rank (2020). Country Rankings. Available at: https://www.scimagojr.com/countryrank.php
Scimago Institutions Rankings (2020). University Rankings, Ecuador. Available at: https://www.scimagoir.com/rankings.php?sector=Higher%20educ.&country=ECU
Villanueva-Felez, A., Molas-Gallart, J., and Escribá-Esteve, A. (2013). Measuring personal networks and their relationship with scientific production. Minerva, 51(4), 465-483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-013-9239-5
Webber, K. (2011). Factors Related to Faculty Research Productivity and Implications for Academic Planners. Planning for Higher Education, 39(4), 32-43.
Wickramasinghe, V., and Malik, K. (2018). University-industry Collaboration in Sri Lanka-A developing country perspective. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 15(04), 1850032. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877018500323
Wills, D., Ridley, G., and Mitev, H. (2011). Research productivity of accounting academics in changing and challenging times. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 9(1), 4-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/18325911311307186
Youndt, M.A., Subramaniam, M., and Snell, S. A. (2004). Intellectual capital profiles: An examination of investments and returns. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 335-361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00435.x
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
© CSIC. Los originales publicados en las ediciones impresa y electrónica de esta Revista son propiedad del Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, siendo necesario citar la procedencia en cualquier reproducción parcial o total.Salvo indicación contraria, todos los contenidos de la edición electrónica se distribuyen bajo una licencia de uso y distribución “Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional ” (CC BY 4.0). Puede consultar desde aquí la versión informativa y el texto legal de la licencia. Esta circunstancia ha de hacerse constar expresamente de esta forma cuando sea necesario.
No se autoriza el depósito en repositorios, páginas web personales o similares de cualquier otra versión distinta a la publicada por el editor.